this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
1390 points (98.3% liked)

Greentext

4635 readers
1535 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

2007 ? Everybody around me was pirating every single piece of media in 2000 and we were late to the party

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Napster was a household name and made mp3 piracy mainstream in 1999!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The golden days of the net 🥲

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I really wish I was a consultant for these fucking jokers.

Back when Disney+ was just "Rumor has it Disney wants to launch their own Netflix-like streaming service.", I called this shit. I said "Well that's just going to cause this whole thing to fall apart, no one's going to juggle 50 different streaming services just to be able to find something to watch."

And I was fucking right.

The only ethical streaming service is Tubi as it doesn't charge relying on ads alone, and it's a neat little bonus that Tubi has actively aided in the restoration of lost media.

If it aint on Tubi, then I'm going to yo-ho-ho with a bottle of fuck you.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

just going to cause this whole thing to fall apart

Disney Plus generated $8.4 billion revenue in 2023, an 13% increase year-on-year.

lol

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Yes, but they also brought back piracy, eroded faith in the brand, and while Disney+ is making money.....

Disney's newer efforts are kinda showing it's not the powerhouse it used to be. With the only thing they really have going for them are the legacy media that they're holding hostage on a platform, they arbitrarily removes things from time to time for seemingly no reason (the Willow series for example, which makes very little sense since that was original to Disney+ to begin with and for some reason Buzz Lightyear of Star Command isn't on the platform despite all the other Toy Story media being present... and there are several episodes of The Simpsons that are just straight up memory-holed; most infamously the Michael Jackson episode)

If this trend continues, Disney will be left with people pirating the legacy media that people at home have shaky access to at best (Monthly fee for content that may be removed with no notice and for no reason), especially as prices soar and wages stay the same, and interest in newer project dwindling.

Or to be blunt, one of the most classic blunders: High short term profits at the cost of being unsustainable in the long term.

Sure it's easy to think of Disney as laughing its way to the bank, but.. think of it this way.

Disney's been king of the world, especially in animation (Which has been getting sidelined in favor of live-action. I guarantee if Mufasa was animated it'd be running neck and neck with Sonic 3 instead of lagging behind). They're a luxury limousine running fast on a road that has no other cars (because Disney bought those cars), and the tank's running out of gas. You won't know it's running on fumes until it comes to a complete stop, but at the speed it's going it will take awhile...

And the second it stops, a simple fuel service isn't going to get it running again. It will get running again, too many people need it to run. So they'll call a mechanic, and it will take to the streets once more.

Is Disney cooked? of course not, but they will see a return of their darkest days. A decade or two of the Disney brand no longer being that shining seal of quality people take it for.

I see it comparable to Nintendo's Wii-U days when the company was a joke with no 3rd Party support and consumers who weren't even sure what the Wii-U was even supposed to be. (Too many passed on it, believing it to be an overpriced gimmicky tablet add-on for the Wii... The launch title being NSMBU instead of something fans hadn't already seen before I think is a big part of the blame for that.)

Nintendo didn't wind up in bankruptcy, but they'd need to reinvent the wheel via the Switch, win back 3rd Party Support, and rekindle the faith of the fans, to get back to being a power house.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I guarantee if Mufasa was animated it'd be running neck and neck with Sonic 3 instead of lagging behind).

But mufasa IS animated

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's also shit. Animation only goes so far.

Say what you will about Sonic. No one involved in those films is having a bad time. There's a lotta heart there and it shows.

Mufasa is shlok incarnate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

You know what I mean

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

And they somehow just became profitable... while also already legacy owning thr vast majority of content

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

🏴‍☠️🎶"Yo! Ho! All hands, hoist the colours high!"🎶🏴‍☠️

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Exactly this and more.

I'm not even pirating because it's cheaper, or easier. I have near 100TB in storage, and it takes hours per week to search material, have it downloaded, checked, etc. I just am done with the marketing, the branding, the advertising, the bullshit rules. I just want to watch what I want to watch and media companies made this impossible so I'm forced to sail the high seas

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why not just... Automate that with an Arr stack? And use Jellyseer to find new and popular movies and shows.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 78 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I feel like people are ignoring that Netflix was bleeding money during their "golden age". They only switched to being profitable a couple years back. A lot of times what people describe as enshittification is just unprofitable companies having to come up with an actual business model as venture capital dries up.

Also, merry Christmas:)

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You can also argue that silicon valley has that particular business model of purposely making a product look great and cheap until enough people sign up.

It's distinct from how most companies run in the red at their inception in that those traditional businesses would gladly be in the black but are waiting for economies of scale or building a reputation among consumers.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Netflix has a market cap of 300bn. Public markets picked up right where venture capital left off no bother. The problem I think was the competitive forces as much as enshitified business model, though perhaps one cannot exist without the other. Certainly without doing their own content they could easily have become ludicrously profitable as a redistributer only, though I'm not convinced it would have stopped everyone and their dog moving in on the space.

Facebook is really the cleaner example of enshitification. They could have happily printed modest money for ever as the preeminent social network, but they took the greedy approach and morphed into a cesspool.

Merry Christmas to you!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 day ago

Netflix didn't get greedy (well not in that way). The movie companies wanted to make their own platform, which would have left Netflix with nothing. So they had to become their own production company. They said "we have to become a production company faster than production companies become streaming companies".

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (8 children)

2007? I remember watching a DivX of The Matrix back in 99. Prior to that I remember watching south park episodes in the RealPlayer.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Those RealPlayer Southpark episodes were 15mb and had 8 pixels

[–] rumba 7 points 1 day ago

South Park's graphics were so bad back then that probably almost sufficed.

[–] rumba 8 points 1 day ago

I watched the entirety of Blair witch project the week before it came out in a real player at 300 by 200 pixels. I kept rotating between watching it thumbnail sized and watching it regular player sized. Both were equally inferiorating

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Yeah this was going on before that. Media Piracy really set-off in the late 90s when DSL, and cable, internet services became mainstream. Also Netflix started making their own content in response to a growing number of competing services, all fighting over the same pool of production companies' work, and having exclusive rights to one IP, or another, rather than other services being the result of netflix making their own content.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 260 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Anon got it backwards, networks noticed how profitable Netflix was and bumped the price for Netflix to stream their stuff. Netflix responded by producing their own content rather than leasing others’ at exorbitant rates. Then Netflix later got greedy and bumped their prices, lowered their quality, and cancelled all of their good shows.

[–] [email protected] 88 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

I think it's a bit of both. Netflix knew that companies choosing to pull their content would be a threat, so they prematurely started producing content (famously starting with House of Cards and Orange is the New Black). Whether because they saw this as a threat or because of the perceived greater profitability of their own platforms (probably a bit of both), other studios started pulling their content from Netflix and setting up their own streaming sites.

And naturally, other companies pulling their content accelerated Netflix's desire to produce their own content to ensure they weren't left in the lurch.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Yall are overcomplicating things. Let me simplify.

Capitalist corporations + infinite greed = cannibalism

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 114 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (20 children)

Except people aren’t necessarily going back to piracy en masse

Torrent sites are dwindling, even the big ones have sad membership numbers compared to 10yrs ago

A large amount of internet users access the internet via devices that are openly hostile to or outright disallow anything that would enable piracy. The devices are then connected to an internet that is further hostile and aims to steer you away from anything deemed unsavory

Phones and tablets are cumbersome and unintuitive to navigate. In the case of apple torrent clients are not allowed to be listed on their app store and sideloading is involved and kind of a pain. Chromebooks and windows 11 are better obviously but less utilized then you’d think

But that leads to the second point, which is kind of angry old man yells at cloud, but people are just less tech inclined now. It makes sense because modern tech is designed to oppress the user whereas tech in the late 90s and early 2000s was more to empower them. They don’t bother to figure out how to install applications, use the file explorer, change settings, etc. the very basic steps needed to pirate shit (you obviously don’t need to be a super hacker). They don’t need to. The command prompt or a terminal is something that makes them think you’re hacking shit

They download applications like steam and then their browser auto opens the installer, then steam handles installing games and mods from that point on. They are safeguarded against having to deal with the icky filesystem and their hand is held every step of the way. Or they just download stuff from the official MS app store and even more hand holding. It’s okay because they’re only gonna install 5 streaming apps anyway and then use the browser to visit the 6 approved websites that google or bing search sends you to for basically any query.

And that’s only if they actually have a proper computer. If they have a tablet or phone they either are pushed extremely heavily towards the above scenario, or in the case of apple they simply have no other option

10 years from now the internet will just be 2-3 social media sites, a few shopping conglomerates, wikis, and streaming sites. The devices used to access will no longer let you access the filesystem directly, apps will be unable to be installed if they aren’t code signed by apple or google or ms or whoever, sealed in epoxy, and draconian drm everywhere. 40 years from now your grandchildren will think you’re weird for complaining about how you used to have autonomy and authority over your devices once you owned them and they’ll remind you it’s time to pay another $400 bezobucks to rent the google chrome ar internet hub for another month because you’re not allowed to own it and it’s a federal crime to take it apart

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Direct download piracy and streaming is surprisingly popular.

With a bit of effort you can stream any movie directly to your TV for a few moneys a month (or free, but paying for the essential bits removes the jankiness)

Basically you select the movie, a system finds the torrent or DDL, a service downloads it (or has it cached) and you stream it to your device.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

With a bit of effort you can stream any movie directly to your TV for a few moneys a month (or free, but paying for the essential bits removes the jankiness)

Something I learned back in the day: "Never pay for warez". Pirate all you want, the moment you are paying, pay the creator of the product you're interested in, not someone who pirated it and wants to profit from distributing it without a licence.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

While I agree with the trend for the average person, I think in pure numbers there are always going to be more tech savvy people in the foreseeable future.

Sure, 80% of people online in the 2000s and 90s were all tech savvy hobbyists, but their numbers was low (let’s say a million).

Now only 0.5% might be tech savvy, but that is 0.5% of a billion people, which would be 5 mil compared to 800k above.

I obviously picked convenient numbers but the point still stands, there are lots of tech savvy places today and it’s growing, just not as fast as the non tech savvy crowd unfortunately.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I haven't stopped sailing those seas. A pirate's life for me. :)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Netflix entered into the already existing sphere of greed based commodification / exploitation that legacy media created decades ago. these legacy media conglomerates (owned circularly by the same big players in wall street black rock, vangaurd, state street et all.) dominate and control multiple industries and now Netflix is just part of that same ecosystem amassing wealth for their own self centered agenda without much, if any oversight at all. Theres just few greedy old cigar smoking men or rather boardrooms lead by these same men controling a majority of the world. Blackrock, blackston, state street and vanguard circularly own about 20% of disney and they own around the same percentage of netflix as well. Nevermind all the other media outlets they own large shareholding positions of. Greed is not the accidental result its the primary objective

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (6 children)

All I'm going to say is every computer I had was equipped with 2 disk drives until 2010. Elder Millennials and Gen X know why.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 85 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Try the 70s.

That was when VHS and cassette tapes started to hit the market and there was no copy protection on those. Following that, people copied floppy disks enough that they had to make that "dont copy that floppy" jingle.

There was a brief period with the switch to digital and CDROMs where piracy stopped, but then CD burners hit the market and it started again.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 2 days ago (4 children)

It turns out in every era, copyright is a sham. Information in its natural state is free - our legal system tries to change that.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 62 points 2 days ago (4 children)

everyone is forced to pay for media

Anon never copy vhs, cassette tape, cd, and dvd. I lived in southeast asia and pirated cd/dvd is openly sold in night market and low foot traffic part of the mall throughout the late 90s till early 2010s, only occasionally they got raid. Before that we basically record show from cable and rental then copy for each others.

But yes, as GabeN proved again and again, piracy is almost always a service problem and not a pricing problem. Almost.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (14 children)

2007? Anon is a sweet summer child.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago (5 children)

You pirate because prices are too high

I pirate because I have kleptomania

We are not the same

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (12 children)

I want to watch Dark Matter without a million popups, malware or shady "trust me bro" programs.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›