Cause they've spent 3 years and 120 million dollars to salvage cyberunk, and they don't like the fact that people are comparing Starfield to Day 1 Cyberpunk and reminding everyone what a steaming pile of shit Cyberpunk was on launch.
this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
31 points (97.0% liked)
Starfield
2877 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to the Starfield community on Lemmy.zip!
- Follow instance rules (no spam, keep it civil and respectful, be constructive, tag NSFW)
Helpful links:
Spoiler policy:
- No spoilers in titles; if you want to share images with spoilers, preferably post the image in the body of the post. If you do make an image post, mark it NSFW.
- Add
[Spoilers]to your title if there will be untagged spoilers in the post. - Game mechanics and general discoveries (ship parts, weapons, etc) don't need a spoiler tag.
- Details about questlines and other story related content are spoilers. Use your best judgement!
Post & comment spoiler syntax:
<spoiler here>
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Your comment doesn’t make any sense. People are praising Cyberpunk and the designer is defending Starfield.
Why? Cyberpunk had way better quest design than Starfield does. The stories of even the smallest side missions in CP77 were way more interesting than all the faction quests in SF combined.
Half of cyberpunk's quests are gigs that are basically fetch quests. The game in general suffers from how edgy they tried to make V instead of letting you choose their personality.