this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
18 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out [email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The European Union wants elderly people (70+) to undergo medical tests from now on to prove that they are still capable of driving a car every five years. However, the proposal has been met with a lot of criticism.

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Very good. As a german, I'd welcome this.

However, expect heavy pushback from the German automotive industry. They are for Germany what the NRA and weapons manufacturer lobby is to the US.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If a german pensioneer can't drive a german car with more than 250 kph on the german Autobahn from north to south, west to east: how can we have EINIGKEIT UND RECHT UND FREIHEIT?

/s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You are missing this: !!!1111

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Does the German automotive industry also exercise immense power and influence in both politics and society?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Germany is unbelievably car-centric for a developed country. It's also nicely planned, so most of the time you can survive pretty well without a car, but car is still the king here

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That's a solid "Yes, definitely!"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Germany has more cars per capita than the US and Germany is the only country without a speedlimit on motorways. So yes, they definitely do

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Looks like you're right, I heard this fact in a YouTube video or something and didn't check against. I'm sorry, I don't want to spread misinformation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Medical tests?? bleh. Driving is driving, health is health. All drivers should have a to retake basic driving tests at an increasing rate until by the age of 70 where it maxes out at once per 5 years or something.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree, especially since medical tests won’t show the driver slowing down as they enter a roundabout or taking a full minute to shift lanes or positioning themselves so they can’t even look in the rearview mirror.

A ton of driving is about behaviors and tendencies. A driver that has no awareness of other drivers is a dangerous driver, regardless of how good their heart, eyes, or reaction time. Dementia obviously affects this, but you can get a clean bill of health from your doctor and then drive off home in the left lane at 5 below the speed limit because other people are just going too damn fast.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yep, well said :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This would be great. We should also require all drivers to pass small exams every ~10 years in order to assert that they are up to date with new laws and new types of infrastructure.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If they would do that we would finally get a strong lobby for decent public transport!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Good Idea. It's widely accepted that cognitive capabilities can decline rapidly with old age. It simply makes no sense that a person that needs 8 tries and 10 minutes to change the station on their TV is still allowed to operate a two ton death machine without any checks in place.

The important part here is to make it so that it ONLY "catches" declined driving capabilities and is not also biased in terms of social and financial status or maybe if you're an immigrant or something.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There's a pretty serious concern here about the mobility and independence of the elderly... but that can't be put over and above public safety. I see either very anxious and hesitant, or completely off with the fairies and uncaring elderly drivers on a frequent basis.

They wouldn't get anywhere near a licence if they had to demonstrate their competence even once more, let alone semi-regularly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Mobility for the eldery IS important but IMHO there should be affordable, easy accessible options without the use of a personal vehicle. Otherwise it get's harder and harder for the eldery to participate in social activities which are beneficiary to mental health and prevent early symptoms of Alzheimers disease.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Should be every 2 years - for everyone with a license.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It shouldn't. That's a monumental administrative task. My gov can barley keep up with issuing passports. Imagine having to reissue drivers licenses with a check up every 2 years for everyone...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That seems beyond excessive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That seems expensive to enforce. It would make more sense for people to be tested every 10 years till age 68, every 5 years till age 78, then every two years after that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good.

Normalize checking peoples cognitive abilities.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Provided age is not the trigger given that no proof has been provided supporting the age limit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Well random age limits are all over. For Voting, Working, optainig the driver license, drinking, being out late, You name it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I can sort of understand the downvotes, but can anyone link a study maybe?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wish we could test for cognitive ability for voting access over 70.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The german satire party DIE PARTEI wanted to implement a highest voting age. If you can't vote the first 18 years of your life, you shouldn't be able to vote the final 18 years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I seriously hoped it would have been implemented The older folks seem to ruin germany more the older they get

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I've been saying the same thing for years. We should revoke voting status 18y from whatever the national average lifespan. That'll never happen, though.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How to determine when the last 18 start, though?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well insurance companies have all the models necessary for that. It's actually called actuary and it's a field of mathematics.

Or, average national lifespan