I think a lot of people missed the point of it, but I don't really know what, if anything in that entire movie could be seen as aspirational. Playing the bass? Cheating on a teenager with a girl with dyed hair? Getting in a sword fight in a club? Like, nothing in that movie is the type of thing I would describe as a goal.

Everyone I hung out with loved the movie, but nobody missed that Scott is a disastrous human being. The movie actually insists that no, you cannot just weasel your way out of problems with the Power of Love, you have to learn Self-Respect so that you can also respect others and acknowledge your role in creating the current situation before you can move on.

And of course, the gag where "Nega-Scott" is actually a really good guy... because regular Scott is terrible. The movie is pretty clear about this.

Was this real? Did I mandela effect it from the negative zone or something? Am I just getting old?

I think so. I don't think Scott Pilgrim had anywhere near the cultural impact you're assigning to it. This is my anecdotal memory, so take it for what it is.

When it came out, it did well, people talked about it for like a week or two, and then everyone moved on to whatever the next movie was, like most popular movies. It didn't have even half the cultural impact of Fight Club, people weren't still quoting it years after it came out, I had honestly forgotten about it till everyone here started talking about it again. Even among the bigger fans of the movie I've met, none of them emulated Scott, consensus seemed to be he was a douche. Even I got that when I first saw it and I sucked at media analysis back then. They cast fucking Micheal Cera to play him, people have hated that dweeb since he was in Arrested Development, he mostly gets cast as annoying assholes these days.

I think the movie got made because annoying hipsters were a thing at the time it came out, there were already tons of memes about how annoying hipsters were, years before the film was even in Pre-production. I don't think the film made any significant contribution to the population of hipsters. I was a bit of a hipster back then, and I liked the movie but it didn't inspire me to be more of a hipster, if anything it made me wanna cool it a bit.

So I don't know why everyone is assigning all this cultural capital to a movie that was about as influential as Weekend at Bernie's.

I really think you're remembering a much bigger impact than there actually was.

I remember people were charmed by it for a while because it had a lot of video game jokes that were really natural and unforced, which is something I don't think any other movie before or since has managed to pull off.

But I also remember people stopped talking about it pretty quick. I was in college in California at the time so that's my reference point.

I don't know if the creators of the movie "got the point" either. That movie really feels like Hollywood fundamentally misunderstanding another medium (in this case comics) as usual. The alternate ending worked much better for the movie I think.

The comic really drives the point home about how being a shitty hipster makes you a pretty shitty person, with silly video game style boss fights thrown in. It's a great read, with the characters becoming increasingly insufferable the older you are compared to them. Edit: This sounds like a negative, but it is deliberate and works really well in the context of the story.

what i don't get about all the discourse around here lately when it comes to this movie is attacking the wrong 'bad part' of the movie (as someone who has been a fan of it)

no one I know was influenced by scott, if anything he's the opposite of an aspirational figure - there is little, if any, cultural impact stemming from his character.

who we SHOULD be talking about is Ramona, and the way in which the Manic Pixie Dream Girl girlfriend became such an integral part of the 2010s culture, it's impact on dudes who saw themselves as sitting outside the mainstream who now thought that an MPDG would fix them, and how this in turn affected women (feeding into internalised 'not like other girls' misogyny that was coming from spaces like early Tumblr)

I remember the movie having all the cultural impact of a wet fart, particularly considering it did pretty poorly at the box office, even if it did develop an audience later.

Has anyone ever really watched a movie with a character played by Michael Cera and thought, "Oooh, him! I want to be just like him!"

I gotta be honest this is way too over the top. Shitty venues and dive bars? Oh no, thats so terrible.

Scott Pilgrim is more incelcore than fight club

I remember I was part of a very small cadre of people who went to go see it while there was a line around the block for the latest "Expendables" movie. It was definitely always more of a cult film, but it definitely had a huge impact on the people who were fans of it (especially those who were also in media). It's kinda like the Speed Racer movie in that sense I guess.

As for myself: I saw it in my early 20s when it came out and I definitely got that Scott was not "aspirational"....but I also didn't get just how much of a fucking asshole he was until my 30s so....mixed bag.

I remember an insufferable vegan guy being a huge fan of the movie, but I didn't notice any dive bar activity in the UK.

Back then Wetherspoons were dingy old depressing pubs full of old men and moulding furniture.

Now they've all gone upmarket and you'd have to fight to find a nice comfortably depressing place to get drunk for under a tenner.

I don't blame the film for that though, just the rising cost of living forcing stay-at-home-barkeepers to reconsider whether it's worth keeping the pub open, or selling to some startup cunt.

ive seen one fight inspired by this movie in the middle school also its trash and he sexually assaults the lesbian character, like no one talks about that. it upset me so much in middle school i stopped talking to my aunt who recommended it to me for a week lol.

No what actually happened is hipsters are naturally obnoxious

My memory of watching that movie is feeling uncomfortable and realizing "oh, these characters are the people I went to college with."

I was in DC at the time and went w hipster friends who hadn't read the comics.

They found it entertaining but I don't think aspirational was really the reaction? Granted they wanted my take (which was and still is, it got the style of the graphic novel but totally gutted the story's emotional depth), so maybe my instant negative reaction to the second half of the film played a role.

False. I hear this all the time about the comic or the movie and frankly I'm never sure what phenomenon it's referring to. At worst it was part of the wave of the mainstreaming of nerd culture, which brought mutual ruin to both the mainstream and nerd culture. Maybe you could tie it to every independent music scene simultaneously becoming shit, but I'm not sure I see the causal link there.

What I do remember is the word "hipster" becoming popular in the late 00s and almost immediately becoming a signifier for any kind of annoying person who thinks they're better than you. This was instrumentalized to bury the last remnants of intellectualism and political consciousness in American culture, paving the way for the sneering stupid consumerism we have now.

what was the point of the movie ?

I largely forgot what it was about, what was the point again?

Scott Pilgrim Versus His Own Main Character Syndrome

I think it got more recognition later for being an Edgar Wright movie than it did immediately on release, and it does have some decent sight gags. I saw it around when it came out because I had read the comics but I don't know that I heard people talking about it much until years later when it was mostly people bemoaning how others had missed the point

This is cruel to some of us hipsters who were just nerds with obscure tastes and fell into the hipster label. Seriously, I didn't think crocs would be a joke until some 20+ years later!