66
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Personally, I want nothing to do with them and I'm not willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. I moved to the Fediverse to get away from all these corpos.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Judging from their past and all the bad actions they have done in the past, bad for democracy, privacy, minorities and marginalised people and how openly they have a far/extreme-right bias. Well I feel extremely negative about them joining in. They were also part of destruction of another open/federated protocol in the past: they played big part in destroying XMPP/Jabber messaging. So I am afraid they will do their usual embrace, extend, and extinguish thing and their surveillance capitalist thing and yeah. no good. Best to block their instances outright.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, I was thinking of Jabber as well, when I heard this. For a brief period everything was perfect. Facebook and Google were both using Jabber. And even WhatsApp was using it, I think. So if you had an account somewhere you could actually chat with all your friends, totally unimpeded.

EU should hurry up with their federation laws.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I was going to say, while we can't do Mich about them adopting an open protocol, please defederate with them

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

They are free to set up an instance. Not sure who would federate with them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

My feeling about Meta joining the Fediverse is: 🚨DANGER!🚨

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

They will datamine all federated users They will set up a CDN for uploads on their platform that will track you like v.meta.com or i.meta.com.

They will probably train LLMs off the data. They will sell the data to advertisers or data brokers. They will most likely have ads or pay to boost.

They will diverge from the standard once they have the majority of users like google does with chrome and the web.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

News story I looked up. Fuck Meta and all the other money-sucking bastards that want to commodify every breath I take.

https://fediversereport.com/meta-plans-on-joining-the-fediverse-the-responses/

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Meta is more likely to pull people away from Twitter than Mastodon is, and having all of Twitter be run with ActivityPub / open to federation is a good thing.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I guess I'll just go back to reading books and watching movies full time.

Fuck all of those tech giants.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It'll be near impossible for them to destroy the fediverse thankfully

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I'm trying to get away from Facebook and meta. I'd rather they weren't remotely near me at all

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Even if they were somehow not evil, the sheer volume would technologically destroy any instance that tried to federate with them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I have to say, i don't like it, i mean i got here, because i didn't want to have anything to do anymore with them, but i guess if we are careful enough, they probably can't do to much to destroy our current fediverse.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

It's the old Microsoft strategy again - Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.

They deserve a good boot up the arse before they put one up our's.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

They see the fediverse trend gain9ng steam with the rise of Mastodon and go "Oh sheit we need to be on that for $$$". Proceed to embrace, extend, enshittify, and extinguish. Its nothing but Zuckerberg's gasping breaths to try and stay relevant as his company begins the very slow, but inevitable, backslide into technological irrelevance.

I will be leaving and/or blocking any instance that chooses to federate with anything related to Meta. They are antithetical to the entire foundation of the metaverse and they ruin everything they touch.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Fuuuuuck no! This isn't actually happening right? This is just an idea I hope?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Lmao want nothing to do with them. One of the reasons I’m here is to escape these dogshit corpos

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I say we just don't allow them on most kbin/lemmy instances. Let the people decide what info is bullshit or not.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Give meta the boot

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Just block them from federating and move on.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For myself, I'm not a fan either. But I think it could be a very good thing for the fediverse (still not a fan of that word)


which, as I understand it, is all about choice: the ability to easily access content across the fediverse, with the ability to ignore it just as easily.

If it ends up breeding toxicity, then I'll block any subs, and possibly the whole instance†. And if it gets really bad, I'll just find a lemmy/mastodon/whatever instance that has defederated from them.

† Sounds like this maybe isn't possible yet, but is being looked at https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/2397

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

keep corporations OUT

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Meta is a corporation with a really horrible track record

and even if they didn't, it's still a corporation; it only cares for profit

I have very negative opinions on them joining

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

We would be opening the door to allow a large corporation to do what they've done with open source for a while. They'll privatize the public commons.

But all this work [GPL licensing] was ridiculed. Microsoft, through Github, Google and Apple pushed for MIT/BSD licensed software as the open source standard. This allowed them to use open source components within their proprietary closed products. They managed to make thousands of free software developers work freely for them. And they even received praise because, sometimes, they would hire one of those developers (like it was a "favour" to the community while it is simply business-wise to hire smart people working on critical components of your infrastructure instead of letting them work for free). The whole Google Summer of Code, for which I was a mentor multiple years, is just a cheap way to get unpaid volunteers mentor their future free or cheap workforce.

Our freedoms were taken away by proprietary software which is mostly coded by ourselves. For free. We spent our free time developing, debugging, testing software before handing them to corporations that we rever, hoping to maybe get a job offer or a small sponsorship from them. Without Non-copyleft Open Source, there would be no proprietary MacOS, OSX nor Android. There would be no Facebook, no Amazon. We created all the components of Frankenstein’s creature and handed them to the evil professor.

This article is actually pretty great.

https://ploum.net/2023-06-19-more-rms.html

And for emphasis:

We created all the components of Frankenstein’s creature and handed them to the evil professor.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Corporations already joined the federated internet when they adopted the web.

Even if they wanted to, they can't take over the entire fediverse, that's the point.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

They're trojan horse. We can't stop them from creating their own servers, but we can choose to defederate them. Up with the Anti-Meta Defederation Pact

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

God fucking damn it. I wanted to get away from them.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

To me it sounds like they are trying to Embrace, Extend, Extinguish the fediverse. I wouldn't doubt if at first they adopted it with all the standards then started doing proprietary crap

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

fuck that noise, absolutely do not federate with them

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If Facebook behave and their instances have good moderation, they'll be successful. If they don't, they'll get defederated and turn into some niche twitter clone echo chamber like Truth Social.

Facebook is a company with great open-source tech contributions (React, GraphQL) but absolutely awful products (Literally every social media thing they've got their hands on), which is why they are desperately trying to turn their side project Oculus into their main product. And I think they, as the original "The Social Network" company, see the writing on the wall: that they either embrace federation and decentralization, or get swept away by it into the footnote of social media history.

Now, I don't think Facebook wants to JUST run an instance where they get to control everything. I think the most likely scenario is that Facebook will offer easy managed federated instance setup hosted on their own cloud servers for less tech inclined individuals and companies in the future, and they'll rebrand it as "the actual metaverse", which will finally end their tenure as an advertising company.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

In general, it's great when companies embrace standards and open source. Though in the case of Microsoft, they just did it to gain the market share (embrace, extend, extinguish).

I'm under no illusion that they would be doing it out of the kindness of their hearts or desire to be compliant with standards.

But..i also don't think I can criticize them yet for wanting to do so.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'd reaaally rather not have that happen.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

All instances should defederated with corporation instances ASAP

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It's an easy fix. If an instance you're a part of federates with them then just move to a new instance.

Hopefully this will put instance blocking on the top of the list.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Nope. Just nope. It'll be the death of the Fediverse.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I hate the fact that for a large number of people, this will be how they will be introduced to the fediverse and their view of it will be tainted by Meta. I also dread seeing Meta spam in my federated timeline. And I also fear Meta building its own proprietary features on top of the ActivityPub protocol, making the content generated with them incompatible with independent clients, and allowing Zuck to spread his monopoly to the fediverse as well.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

we shouldnt let them in. they would have done decentralized service years ago if there was money in it for them. They either want us to stop or try to seize control in only way that can -> by worming in.

We must have zero-tolerance for corporations or we might as well just give up.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

My problem with that is then the fediverse doesn't grow, meta controls the largest instance, and they make money off any posts that go viral here. I have to disagree for those reasons. They can go.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
66 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

42608 readers
833 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS