this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
56 points (95.2% liked)

Linux

46777 readers
1878 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi, I've got an old netbook from Samsung that has an old Intel Atom CPU (Intel Atom N455 1.66 GHz). I installed Arch on it and am now thinking of a suitable window manager. I tried Hyprland (kinda expecting it to not work really) whick didn't start at all. Before I had Debian with Gnome, which technically worked, but everything was extremely slow.

I've used Gnome for a long time, but I know that there are a lot of other window managers out there. I would like to have one that avoids graphical gimmickry in order to be fast. (I like some nice little graphical details, but only if it's still running buttery smooth).

If you have some tips that would be very nice!

EDIT: thank you for all the recommendations I'll try out a few!

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Xfce is the best bang for your buck. Lxde isn't much lighter and I never enjoyed using it. I think Lxqt is somewhere between them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

I second xfce. Stable, lightweight, easy to use, and modern (enough).

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Almost everything that's not Gnome can be considered lightweight, to be honest.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

No. S/He's right. Anything (including KDE) is better than gnome.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Could try openbox, its old but works. Highly customisable but still lightweight.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

+1 for openbox. It’s fast and lightweight.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I liked messing around with openbox but I'm very aesthetically challenged so I never managed to make it look good. Any tips?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Protip: It's impossible to make it look good.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Find someone else's config that you like online.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Since Wayland is lighter than X.org, LabWC could be another option. It is not fully compatable with Openbox, but most Openbox configs work on LabWC

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

A bit late to the party, but especially for an older machine I'll take Openbox any day. I still have some low range 2015 laptops running just fine where something like KDE would choke them up completely.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

i3wm is pretty light on resources

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Probably LXQt or MATE

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Maybe dwm or dwl. I'm a hyprland user but this would be the minimum you should go for

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Just a window manager? Not a DE?

Under X11 there is Openbox, bspwm, herbstluftwm, dwm, i3, Awesome, Ratpoison, spectrwm, Qtile, ...

Under Wayland: Weston, LabWC, Wayfire, Sway, River, Cagebreak, dwl, ...

I keep things pretty dull and use Openbox + LXQt. It is a stacking WM that is stable, and LXQt is snappy.

If you are looking for a light DE LXQt is very light, Plasma is lighter than it used to be, but it also has loads of features. Xfce has more options for configuration than LXQt and I think it isn't quite ready for Wayland.

Maybe Sway would be up your alley?

(Note to self: check https://arewewaylandyet.com)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Arch user here. Never had any problems with Sway and Hyprland, but still... ratpoison is what you are looking for.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Well that's a disgusting yet easy to remember name

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Used to have an Eee PC running CrunchBang (Debian + Openbox). Really lightweight and simple (some potential for customization), and it was enough to carry me all the way through university.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I loved CrunchBang. Wish it was still around.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

There is BunsenLabs, I think that's its most immediate successor. https://bunsenlabs.org/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There is crunchbangplusplus. Check it out and relive it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Oh dang. I’m going to have to give that a spin.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Icewm, antix linux uses it and whole system on startup uses ~200mb ram

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

On my old asus eeepc I used to have arch with i3 as a tilling window manager for a while. It was taking a bit to get used to but once I worked it out and configured it how I liked it, it was fantastic. Used it for several years until I had to write my thesis and needed something stable for my operating system.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

for lightweight, i would recommend LXQt (qt) or LXDE (gtk). XFCE also seems pretty nice.

also, you could check out i3 and bspwm if you a tiling window manager.

i would've recommended sway, but it sounds like you didn't have a very nice experience with hyprland, and that could be because it uses wayland.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Try qtile, it's got great documentation and is relatively easy to configure, as it's configuration is done in python.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I am old school and still use Fluxbox for that kind of work load. Wish they had Wayland support!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I have the exact same netbook and specs and I installed fedora lxde a couple months ago just to see how it would go and..it's pretty decent performance if you use it just to browse the web or text editing.. Installed vscodium and it got laggy as hell though ... Had to use geany instead

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Is you specifically want a wayland compositor like hyprland, you can try sway or qtile. I've also heard good things about river but never used it myself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

dwm (or dwm-flexipatch if you dislike patching manually)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)
  • This or any tiling window manager, because small screen. If dwm is hard for you, try with bellow options.
  • i3wm was my first, but now I'm happy with my actual dwm config.
  • Awesomewm starts as a dwm fork, but with all included and easier for beginners.
  • There are a lot more, but I start with this.

You get better screen use space and smaller memory requirements.

But your real big problem, is going to be web browser, all of them consume insane amount of RAM because of web bloat, and always is going to be a problem. Just 1 tab open and a lot of patience.

My old netbook had just 1GB ram, later I did an upgrade to 2GB and was the maximum possible.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

i guess the best you could go for web browser lightweightness would be qutebrowser, or maybe emacs' eww?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Maybe netsurf, Dillo or w3m/links, if you don't need JavaScript, if you do, you need at least 4GB RAM to have a better web experience.

Today's web is very RAM hungry (bloat).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

why not Dwm ?