[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

Uh, I'm not OP.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago

Why do you feel the need to make such statements regarding the motivation without any source or evidence to back them up?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

It's also completely unnecessary. The shooter was a registered republican and apparently known to be a horrible shot, so he wasn't left-wing and definitely wasn't recruited by any organization for his sharpshooting skills.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Thank you. That's a great example of real whataboutism.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Oh, for sure. It is very sad.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago

That's not whataboutism. I'm showing the hypocrisy in one rule being justified, but not the other, so as to argue more effectively against the age rule. Whataboutism is when you change the subject.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

So it's okay to have a constitutionally-mandated age requirement, but not a no-treason requirement?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

caught a DV charge

Nah. Gotta draw the line somewhere.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

In the mirror situation, Trump would've just had the opposing court justices assassinated and then installed puppets that would rule that those assassinations were official acts.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

This was how my relatively modern laptop with an HDD ran when it had Windows 10 (which it came with). The main difference was that it was closer to 5-10 minutes.

I switched to Linux and the problem went away. Funny how that works.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

It was legitimate in the same way that a dictator's rule over their people is legitimate or hangings for blasphemy are legitimate. It may be technically written on a piece of paper somewhere, but someone who got less votes becoming president over someone who got more is not representative of a genuinely legitimate democracy.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Donald Trump lost the popular vote and was illegitimately placed into power by the broken electoral college system.

70
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I daily drive Firefox, but more and more websites are starting to break without Chromium, so I still have to occasionally switch to get something working. I was using Ungoogled Chromium until I realized that there was no easy way to update it when that pixel-stealing exploit came out a while back.

To be clear, I'm not talking about stock "no settings changed" Vivaldi. With that requirement, even Firefox could be called invasive! What I want to know is if Vivaldi is relatively safe to use with all the telemetry and stuff disabled in the settings and using any necessary extensions.

Thanks!

21
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

For the past couple of days, I've been getting timed out or needing to wait a very long time for things to load. Did we get another influx of users from Reddit? I haven't seen any announcements. I love this instance and its federation policy because I can just filter out specific instances myself on Boost, so I'll only switch if I really need to.

Just tried to post this and got a time out error. (3x)

Now 400 rate limit.

80
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I normally use the Aurora frontend, but I used Google's app to check something. I couldn't help but notice that when I swiped and then let go, the page would barely move past the point I had let go. It had no momentum whatsoever. As soon as I got past the ads, scrolling was back to normal and the exact same flinging motion would send me down by at least a screen's worth.

Has anyone else noticed this?

275
Windows rule (i.ibb.co)
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
185
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

It's very nice to see that X people liked a post/comment and Y people disliked it instead of just having a singular "goodness/badness" rating. It (literally, in a mathematical sense) adds a whole new dimension to post ratings and gives us a more nuanced understanding of people's opinions. Plus, it feels a lot better to see that 5 people agreed with you and 7 disagreed when you made a controversial statement instead of just seeing a score of -1 telling you how bad you are.

view more: next ›

AeroLemming

joined 11 months ago