this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
80 points (95.5% liked)

Android

27333 readers
88 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

[email protected]


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I normally use the Aurora frontend, but I used Google's app to check something. I couldn't help but notice that when I swiped and then let go, the page would barely move past the point I had let go. It had no momentum whatsoever. As soon as I got past the ads, scrolling was back to normal and the exact same flinging motion would send me down by at least a screen's worth.

Has anyone else noticed this?

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes. Same has been happening on YouTube for me. It'll stick right on an ad.

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

I'll check those out, thanks.

[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

Entire Play Store front page is sluggish on my pixel 6a. Everything is an ad now.

[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I thought I was the only one!

Here I'm using a Google branded phone and yet some Google services are slow/sluggish? How embarrassing.

Apple is scrutinizing details like bevels and curves, where Google doesn't give a fuck about how their one apps work on a flagship phone?

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

At this point, the play store has such a monopoly that they can do whatever the fuck they want. That's why there are so many ads.

In my opinion, software that can be considered required for hardware that you've paid for to work (OS/system level apps) should not be allowed to have ads by law. It's also a double infraction when they bait'n'switch you by slowly rolling out more and more ads on a phone you already bought.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

There's a FOSS app for just about everything. You can also use Micro G to replace Google Services, so there's almost no reason for using anything Google on an Android phone.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

My apps all work perfectly, and my phone definitely isn't sluggish. Can you give any examples?

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

it's a very convenient place for the app to load the next page of content...

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Playing devil's advocate here, the old store system I worked for always inserted cross-sellers at each page-break, too. It was just how the underlying code worked, it first loaded a batch of products, checked whether the user was supposed to see them, then figured out cross-sellers for it.

But by nature of that, if you say load 50 products at a time, you end up with those 50 being in the list of returned objects found, followed by the 5 (in our case) ads. So by nature, once someone scrolls to the ads, a short jitter happens as the system loads the next 50 objects for sale (and the next 5 crosssellers).

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

It might just be that the ad is bogging down the device, rather than a change to the scrolling behaviour. I've definitely had my phone heat up noticeably when it's trying to load an ad.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

That's a fair point. It's so strange that it does that, especially when the ad is functionally identical to a normal piece of content for that medium.

[โ€“] [email protected] -3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Dont have ads in mine. Are you not blocking ads at the DNS level? I assume anybody thats not must enjoy them.

Also, check your logic. You have a phone branded by an ADVERTISING company, many Androids apps are free (to you) because of ads, while the same apps are paid ones on iOS. How do you think that works?

I have a Pixel, run Graphene, sanbox the play store and block ads at the DNS level, seeing ads is a choice you're making.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Experience-based vendor lock-in while getting bait'n'switched with increasing amounts of ads is not a consumer choice. To assert otherwise is extremely ignorant of the power dynamics between individual consumers and the duopoly that we have in the phone market.

I do block ads on the DNS level. You're probably running a modded version of the client without realizing it.