[-] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

Nah. Then they'd just be embarrassed they had been pushing a book with such a woke lefty agenda. Some might even learn that they can throw away most of that commie stuff in the later parts of the book, and just keep the juicy bits they liked in the first half about how men are in charge, and slavery is okay so long as you follows some rules. Oh, except Revelations. That part rocks, let's keep that. In fact... Let's make it happen. That would be so sick.

/s (even though I really shouldn't have to)

[-] [email protected] 18 points 4 weeks ago

Holy shit... How can you rightly identify that the US military (and the US government's use of said military) is evil, and that killing people for their ideas just spreads those ideas, but then somehow come to the conclusion that public health mandates during a pandemic are unconstitutional and "billionaires in this country got rich by actually serving their fellow man"?

Fucking hell, the propaganda machines are in overdrive.

Appreciate a veteran telling kids not to join the military. (Assuming this was written by an actual veteran, and isn't just fictional propaganda.)

The rest is idiotic corpo bootlicking unrelated to the topic.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I'm starting to give legitimate consideration to the question, "Are they trying to lose?"

I know, "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence", but... Come on! At what point is it no longer an "adequate explanation"?!

[-] [email protected] 45 points 4 weeks ago

Normandy. Launching attacks on fascists for 80 years.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

And the few who have turned on him now prefer the guy who literally had a worm eat part of his brain.

This reality must be satire.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Shit, I'd do that job for minimum wage, if only to see Musk fired.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I somehow don't think we'll find a site that breaks down every purchase the government has made, let alone one that specifically detects and highlights corruption.

So I guess the official budgets are the best I can do to helpfully answer the question. Sorry.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I haven't had my blood boil like reading that McConnell piece.

I can't even put the rage into words.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

That must be hyperbole, right?

Like... The Enron guys at least, right?

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sure, but that quote calls it a "virus" but the headline says "fungus".

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

The whiplash when I realized it wasn't a critique of those ideas but endorsing them.

It literally read like they were outlining those positions as straw men to be torn down, and then was like, "Yep! That scarecrow has the right idea!"

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

Just did a quick search, "interactive chart of us state and federal budgets".

Found this government site for federal budgets: https://www.cbo.gov/interactives

For instance, here's a page with charts for the 2023 federal budget: https://www.cbo.gov/publication/59727

I would hope similar sites exist for most, if not all, of the states.

27
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Excuse me if this post isn't up to the usual standards of Daystrom Institute, but as I'm looking for an in-universe discussion of this topic, this community felt the most appropriate.

Does anyone else feel like the Temporal Prime Directive is a potential security risk? You're a security officer, and you find an intruder on board. Before you can call it in, they implore you "Stop! Temporal Prime Directive! This is important!"

Now you've paused, thinking any action could cause a temporal paradox, or damage to the future timeline.

Hell, just that pause alone might be enough for them to draw a weapon on you and neutralize you, if they are hostile.

But, assuming they don't attack, suppose the intruder says "I can't tell you what I'm doing or why, but just know it's imperative, and I have to remain hidden. Please go about your business and ignore me."

You're in a catch 22. If you leave them be, it could turn out they are an enemy spy or saboteur. If you report them, it could turn out they are telling the truth, and you cause a big temporal problem.

This question is inspired by VOY S05E24, "Relativity", where Seven of Nine is sent back in time to Voyager (before she had joined the crew), and she gets caught and confronted by Janeway. Ultimately, Janeway doesn't just take Seven at her word, and makes her explain what's going on, but I'm not sure we should be taking cues on the proper application of the Temporal Prime Directive from Captain Kathryn Janeway.

What are your thoughts?

view more: next ›

ApostleO

joined 9 months ago