Assian_Candor

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Trap bar my man

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh I interpreted that as this is a wretched place where we shove the elderly into nursing homes instead of caring for them in our homes like other places in the world

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

Call your pediatrician and ask them is my advice. I honestly have never thought about it. That said, direct sunlight for prolonged periods is not a good idea for anyone tbh. I still put my 8 year old in a hat and long sleeve rash guard plus sunscreen when we go to the beach.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago

Lol what? Pay the guy

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The virgin sculpture commissioner vs the chad Gothic cathedral commissioner

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What nation is going to prefer the death of its own citizens over the death of civilians of a country they are at war with?

How else to interpret that? Were you suggesting Japan at the end of WW2 posed a risk to US civilians?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 4 days ago

Wishing them a very lost at sea

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes? What kind of stupid question is that

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Soldiers and civilians are the same, I am very smart

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (14 children)

That whole narrative smacks of racism and cowardice

"We had to kill 200k civilians or else we would have had to invade the mainland and risk the lives of our soldiers, who are expected to risk their lives. White lives matter. Anyway they were fanatical, the women would have hurled themselves off of cliffs, dashed their babies against rocks and even the children would have taken up bayonets. How many of our boys would have died? 200,000?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Vaporizing 200,000 civilians over semantics

JK it was to show the Soviets we had the bomb and were willing to use it

Both completely deranged sentiments

 
 

Imagine the crumbliest crackers to ever crack but they’re well meaning liberals, who have expressed interest in learning more about diversity and inclusion. You are tasked with helping open their eyes to the racism they are immersed in and benefit from without scaring them out the gate with the specter of communism. This would be accomplished with regular meetings, probably once a month in frequency. Reading is ideal but we all know nobody does the reading. What films or documentaries are a good place to start that help open the door but are palatable to libs? Stuff like 13th

 

… in the black mold options market

So please unban, I’ve already lost all my apes I can’t handle losing this too

black-mold-futures

 

At first I was like heartbreaking but then I was like bruh

 

https://youtu.be/nHlNJXcBOFg?si=S-B8TY7NUO1JcTa5

Op is 2023, this one is 2021

Now the question is do you take the man’s words at face value?

I struggle to see how you can call a unified coalition of armed groups fighting to depose the government “gang members”

Who the heck knows what’s going on here but the rhetoric speaks for itself, and CIA arming and funding of opposition militias would definitely not be unheard of.

I don’t know anything about the last pres who got assassinated before Henry (who is resigning today) took over in an “interim” capacity 3 or 4 years ago…

There is more to this story for sure imo, this is one to watch

 

Does anyone have good news sources? I am pretty wary of swallowing the state department line that this is all due to “gang violence”… particularly given how racially coded that language is, and when I read into the stories it says they’re mostly attacking government and police buildings. I see embassy personnel are being airlifted. Mainly trying to figure out who are the factions/what is going on

 

IMO: Sleepy Joe looked about as good as he could up there. His brain left his body a couple of times but nothing that couldn’t be papered over, no McConnell freezes etc.

Overall the speech was the same liberal pablum we’ve been receiving for the last 20 years. He cited Reagan positively lol.

Biggest flop imo was he went hard right on the border, at one point calling for the president to have the ability to shut the border down if the number of migrants gets too large. At one point he talked about some girl who was killed by “an illegal.” Very bad look overall.

He also called for a two state solution which I guess has been the official policy or whatever for a while now. They’re going to build a temporary pier to land aid in Gaza. Time will tell how that goes. It will take a few weeks to build, many will starve by then, and there still need to be roads etc for aid to actually reach people.

Other topics covered that I can remember is a bunch of Lucy football shit; banning assault rifles and high capacity magazines, lowering prescription drug prices, protecting roe, raising the minimum wage and increasing taxes on the wealthy and corporations— you know, all the type of shit the dems could have done while in full control of the government but didn’t because manchin or the parliamentarian or whatever the fuck.

At any rate I think what he needed was to go out there and talk for an hour without having his brain leak out of his ears. Mission accomplished.

Whats your take?

 
21
Hell yeah (hexbear.net)
 
 

Have you tried bombing civilians? I hear that is a good way to get money

view more: ‹ prev next ›