AssortedBiscuits

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago

exactly, he's a short-sighted and dumb imperialist.

Plus petty and self-aggrandizing. Has massive "will sack competent ministers and chancellors because they take the spotlight away from the monarch" energy.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Good. Fascist collaborators do not deserve peace in death, let alone peace in life.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

Wow, they finally figured out where the song came from? Damn, that's pretty cool.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

My recollections of an early Christianity course I took in college was that:

  1. You could set a criteria based on historicity that would include most books of the New Testament outside of Revelations.

  2. There's no real criteria that would include every single book of the New Testament minus Revelations but exclude the Gospel of Thomas.

  3. Revelations almost didn't make the cut because a lot of church fathers disliked it.

  4. The Shepherd of Hermas is a book that a lot of church fathers liked but ultimately didn't make the cut.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It just boils down to too many white people here. Like I said in an earlier mega, the fact that a US-centric leftist website with zoomers and millennials as its generational demographic isn't at least 60% POC is disgraceful. The percentage of Hexbear being white is probably around the same as British zoomers. So not even British leftist zoomers, which would exclude white nationalist types like UKIP supporters, but the general zoomer population of the UK. That's how white Hexbear is.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

They fight on behalf of the middle class because they are a part of it. The problem is that they're using the original definition of the middle class which meant the class between the aristocracy and the peasantry.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

Terminally online drama that's not worth caring about.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly, people should just submit their posts to both comms and let the mods sort it out. If both submissions get deleted, then it just shows how the admins and mods are full of shit. Most likely, this will have a chilling effect, which I suspect is what they want in the first place. The admins dislike dunk culture, perhaps triggered by the high point of the dunk tank when the dunk tank rightfully dogpiled on lemmy admins/mods for being pedo apologists, causing the lemmy admin to block the dunk tank from lemmy.ml. Admins probably decided then that the dunk tank is outta control, that it is a loose cannon, that it is alienating the other lemmy instances, blah blah blah.

I think this screenshot summarized why the admins wanted to get rid of the dunk tank.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

The test or exam as a concept (ie people gathering in a room to answer a standardized set of questions with proctors to prevent people from cheating) was invented by the Chinese. And it's not going away anytime soon.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"You and your cope sticks" - Me after my army got obliterated by pike-wielding landsknechts.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So what options do Russia have to retaliate if the yanks stars shooting missiles into Russia? I doubt that they will move directly to total war with NATO but they will have to do something to make it clear that this decision hurts the west as well.

Give S-400s to Iran and Ansarallah.

 

Today in the U.S., after the latest national election, my phone has been buzzing with activity about Trump’s election.

People are reaching out, asking, “What are we going to do?” regarding MAGA Donald Trump’s second victory as president in the last eight years. The fact that people are reaching out is exciting. Unlike most of them, my political activism isn’t limited to just voting in these capitalist elections every two or four years. My activism is a daily commitment: planning and executing events, traveling, speaking, organizing, risking harm to build capacity, writing about our conditions, and mentoring countless young people to organize and build our revolutionary Pan-African movement.

The people reaching out to me know this. They know I’ve been doing this work for decades. These are working-class people with families—African, Indigenous to the Western Hemisphere, European, and more. What they have in common is that I’ve never felt they valued my politics. My engagements with them have overwhelmingly focused on their fears, concerns, and actions, with little to no engagement around the solutions we offer.

Yet, here they are this morning.

A lot of people would view this as insulting. You pour your soul into working for humanity, and most people around you couldn’t seem to care less. They never ask about your work or show any interest in it—not even the people closest to you. Despite this, any revolutionary organizer would relish these moments. The reason is that the question we always seek to answer in our work is the one I’ve been getting all day: “What do we do?”

We welcome the opportunity to offer our insights. By the end of this election, around 80 million people will have voted for the Trump ticket—roughly 22% of the 350 million people in this country. There are a few key takeaways here.

First, our revolutionary organizing and demographic work informs us that out of 350 million people, approximately 100 million are ineligible to vote (too young, convicted of felonies, immigrants, etc.). Of the 250 million eligible voters, about 150 million participate in national elections.

This tells us that among people with higher incomes, primarily European communities, and those aspiring to align with the European capitalist paradigm, the overwhelming majority have made their stance clear. They support a right-wing fascist agenda: anti-African, anti-Indigenous, anti-women, anti-LGBTQ, anti-humanity, and pro-capitalist. These people represent over 50% of voters. This sentiment isn’t confined to one man; it’s what this country fundamentally wants.

As African and other oppressed peoples, it’s our responsibility to accept this cold, hard reality. This means it’s far past time to stop pretending we have a place in this country. From our perspective, it’s incredible that anyone with dignity would even want a place here. But for those who do, you owe it to yourselves and your communities to engage with this reality from a position of dignity.

Stop begging to fit into a society that was never designed for you. Stop playing by rules that were never configured with your interests in mind. If you insist on participating in this electoral process, come into it with the intention to advance the masses, not just a few individuals. Build a mass movement that holds this corrupt system accountable to our interests, one committed to tearing this system to the ground when it violates us.

If we aren’t serious about our future, we’re only upset because what’s happening makes us personally uncomfortable. If that’s the case, we should remain uncomfortable—extremely so. Why should our enemies take us seriously if we lack the regard to fight for the legacy our ancestors sacrificed everything to provide?

The other significant factor is the 100 million people who don’t vote. They aren’t apathetic. This elitist analysis comes from the capitalist system itself. A large percentage of these people are refusing to choose between a violent r*pist and one who talks nicely while they harm you. Both are r*pists, both are terrorists—or, as Malcolm X said, “both are canines.”

For us, these 100 million are potential converts. Africans within this group could join the African revolution. Non-Africans could support revolutionary change as the only viable solution.

This country today is the same as it has been for 531 years: a terrorist settler colony protecting its interests at humanity’s expense. There are no more excuses, no more lame justifications. If you’re committed to reform, you must accept that a mass movement dedicated to disrupting this system on all levels is essential. If you’re ready for something beyond reform, there is plenty of work to build the revolutionary consciousness and capacity needed to bring the empire to its knees.

Anything less is voting for our continued demise. We are better than that. It’s time to stop moping and prove it.

 

ConfessionI voted.

 

Hola, mis amigos, amigas, y amiges. Yo soy un postere en el oso de seis. Yo no soy un lib de cringe, soy beisado. Me gusta los beanis y el soy.

 
 

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

 

There are very few true revolutionaries. Allowing ourselves to pretend that Angela Davis is among them is a grave mistake.

“When we engage in electoral politics, it can’t be just because a particular individual is running for office, it is to enlarge the terrain of mass struggle, to guarantee a space for the trade union movement to win victories, for the women’s movement to win victories, for people of color to win victories, for working and poor people to win victories.”

Angela Davis is certainly correct in speaking these words. They are an important reminder of how we must view and relate to the electoral process. But unfortunately, she followed those remarks with highly questionable assertions which put at risk all that she says she seeks to achieve.

Davis has a habit of engaging in some very grave contradictions, which we have analyzed over the years here at Black Agenda Report. In 2012 Angela Davis felt compelled to give fulsome praise to Barack Obama, including claiming that his rise to the presidency showed a connection with the Black radical tradition. The false statement was quite alarming, as Davis ignored the obvious, that the Obama campaign was a creation of the neo-liberal and imperialist elites who needed a more attractive face in a moment of crisis. Our late comrade Glen Ford observed that, “The ‘delusional effect’ that swept Black America with the advent of the First Black President has warped and weakened the mental powers of some of our most revered icons – and it has been painful to behold.”

It is inexplicable that Davis would claim that Obama emerged victorious in 2008 “despite the power of money.” Obama raised $750 million in his presidential campaign that year. His war chest was so full that he was able to reverse his pledge to seek public campaign financing, unlike his opponent John McCain, who raised a mere $238 million from donors and $38 million in public financing. Surely Dr. Davis was capable of researching the same easily accessible information. Yet she insisted on making claims that are plainly untrue.

Davis’ recent comments diminish her and show that she has become just another acolyte of Democratic Party policy. “It’s not just about electing Kamala Harris. … it’s about opening space for those of us who are more radical than Kamala Harris to put anti-capitalist and anti-racist programs forward and increase the pressure for change, especially in the first place when it comes to the genocide being inflicted on the people of Palestine.“

Her comments border on outright delusion. Kamala Harris brags about the republicans who support her and “welcomes” an endorsement from Dick Cheney. She pledges to include a republican in her cabinet while saying nothing about including more progressive democrats. How would anti-capitalist and anti-racist programs be put forward under such an administration?

This columnist advised ignoring Davis altogether when she declared support for Hillary Clinton in 2016: “I’m not so narcissistic to say that I wouldn’t vote for her.” The defensive and embarrassed tone of the comment was obvious, as if Davis couldn’t bring herself to be clear about her choice to vote for the war criminal who destroyed Libya and insisted that Haiti redo an election in order to get her desired result.

Again, in 2024, Davis talks out of both sides of her mouth, stating that she is still a communist and declaring, “We have to challenge capitalism; it is the enemy of all progressive movements and struggles in the world.” Indeed we must, but that certainly can’t happen while simultaneously supporting Kamala Harris, who pledges no opposition to capitalism and who is therefore, by Davis’ definition, unworthy of support.

As Black Agenda Report has pointed out many times, Kamala Harris is the latest mediocrity to grace the political sphere, put forward by rich donors hoping for a new Obama effect. She is neither intelligent nor talented in any way. Her milquetoast liberalism has given way to right wing policy making, giving slight nods to reproductive rights or other issues that are bright red lines for millions of people.

But Davis also showed herself in 2020 when she was strangely thrilled by the choice of Harris as Joe Biden’s running mate. She supported Biden and Harris despite calling them both “problematic” while concluding, “It’s really a question of who we will be able to pressure.”

There is no evidence of Angela Davis doing anything to pressure Biden or Harris on any issue. The failure of political imagination afflicts the casual voter and the erstwhile radical icon too, who pop up in election years to declare their surrender to the forces they otherwise claim to oppose.

No one is above reproach, regardless of their history. Those who remember the days of the “Free Angela” movement may be stunned by her ongoing slide into political irrelevancy. Yet that is the position that Angela Davis has chosen for herself. Now she offers empty nostalgia, political confusion, and cautionary tales about heroes with feet of clay. It seems that ignoring Angela Davis is still a sensible decision.

 

Imagine the Zuck with a beard-as-his-personality beard or Burnsides sideburns or a douchy chinstrap

 

where were you when class politics was kill

 

Context: The italics are people from that rag asking questions and the print is the interviewee's response.

view more: next ›