Averagemaoist

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I do have to say that Les Grossman in Tropic Thunder was very leftfield for Cruise. I didn't realize it was him until the credits rolled.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Grandad, you can't tame the white supremacist power structure with cheese!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just make it illegal for whites to vote, a lot simpler.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

There were over 40 bombing attacks on Israel by Palestine that year, a lot of them were suicide bombings.

 

SpaceX chief executive Elon Musk reportedly caused a geopolitical crisis last year, when Ukrainian forces—which have relied heavily on the company’s Starlink satellite communications—were on the verge of striking Russian naval vessels off the coast of Crimea with submersible drones. Concerned that the attack would provoke Russia into using nuclear weapons, Musk unilaterally opted to sever the submarines’ satellite connection, throwing a wrench in the entire assault.

The incident—shared by CNN based on an adapted excerpt from an upcoming book by Walter Isaacson—demonstrates Musk’s increasing unwillingness to lend his satellite network to offensive maneuvers waged by Ukraine. “How am I in this war?” “Starlink was not meant to be involved in wars. It was so people can watch Netflix and chill and get online for school and do good peaceful things, not drone strikes.”

After foiling the attack, Musk reportedly received a desperate text from a Ukrainian deputy prime minister, Mykhailo Fedorov, who asked that Musk reinstate the Starlink connection to the drones. “I just want you—the person who is changing the world through technology—to know this,” Fedorov wrote. But Musk refused to reverse course, telling Fedorov that Ukraine “is now going too far and inviting strategic defeat.”

Apparently he was worried that the assault would provoke nuclear war. Musk showing actual thought for the first time in ever.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

" putting a cash price between people and their ability to enjoy their cultures stories."

kombucha-disgust

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The solution is to make streaming services like TV packages where everyone pays $80 a month.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"it does now mostly thanks to co-opting by incels"

I don't really get where this talking point comes from, its just not true. Have you ever browsed an incel forum to see what those hogs are thinking? They never refer to women as females. Ever. I've never seen it once in one of their spaces. Not on r/braincels, not on r/incels, not in incelsco or whatever new forum they've migrated to in the past few years. They exclusively refer to women as foids or holes.

Referring to women as females is very common in the African American community though.

view more: next ›