CaptSneeze

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I’m noticing, but failing to see why that’s significant. Is something interesting going on with spaceX?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

You pass! I’ve done several thousands of these over the past decade.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

The circumference is where everyone lives. The area is comparatively empty.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (15 children)

The bigger reason I don’t go to McDonald’s is because of the self serve kiosks they’ve forced on us instead of paying people to run the registers.

Price is still a reason though, so I’m glad they are at least considering that as well.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The same dark comedy thought crossed my mind!

I expect they might retire and replace the existing judges, one every two years, in order of length of time already served. This would make it so they start this new system off already having 9 seats filled.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Honest question: Could all of the other stuff you’ve suggested happen without getting into amendment territory? I honestly don’t know almost anything about where all these SC things are defined in law, but changing the way the entire SC operates sounds pretty extreme when compared with simply adding term limits. It’s hard to believe it wouldn’t also stray into some constitutional territory.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Hasn’t he already avoided the whole jail problem with the SC deciding that anything a president does is totally cool and perfectly fine as long as it’s “official”?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I thought so too, but I just went searching for the source and it appears that everyone gives attribution for this as “according to the WSJ”, and the WSJ attributes it to “people familiar with the matter”. So, no actual statement from Musk that I could find.

That said, I still think he’s likely contributing to a PAC (which makes it technically true that isn’t directly giving to Trump…). I also suspect that it’s very likely he has an agreement with the PAC that they will then spend this money on ads at Twitter, though I have no evidence to back that up.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Or… “I work hard and live modestly in a small apartment with two dogs that I love. Oops, the landlord just jacked up my rent and I can no longer afford it, and the multi-billion dollar company I work for refuses to allow pay increases to help their low-paid employees deal with inflating prices. Now, I have to live in my car briefly while I figure this situation out.”

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why wait? Just post the graph now.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I sometimes wonder how much of the “power efficiency” modern appliance manufacturers trumpet is completely annulled by the fact that they have 30% the useful lifetime of their less efficient ancestors.

view more: next ›