CatEars420

Jim Crows didn't force businesses to not serve or hire black patrons, it allowed them the option of seperate service which they voluntarily did

Here's a black American describing what ordering from a white restaurant was like

Brief overview of life as a black American working for white businesses and families

Jim Crow was based on the "separate, but equal" clause which said, on paper, black Americans still had to be given service as long as the quality was on the same level as white Americans. It's basically the opposite of an outright ban on non serving non whites, it technically is supposed to enforce serving black Americans

Can you imagine some dumbfuck chud in 2075 being like

Cake decorators wanted to serve gay customers but they weren't allowed to. They didn't care about rainbow, all they cared about was green

Imo, maple syrup is one of the things that's worthwhile to spring for the real stuff

No. They are separate branches of Christianity withotally different modes of operation, control, and philosophy though they are both very reactionary

You will need to reshape who the userbase is in order to cross a threshold from disapproval to approval. Slow purges are required to achieve this in a number of ways. One of the benefits of purges is that if you’re removing one “type” of person you’re usually making a community attractive to a different type.

Small example: Hexbear :gui-trans:

Two rounds of purging over a few months of anti trans posters to make Hexbear safer for trans ppl

Try and turn Napoleon into a Marxist

Ukraine Mega topics are getting weird

Imagine people living through the depression being like "Edison electrocuting that elephant started all this"

Blue haired SJW Pontius Pilate