DogMuffins

joined 1 year ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

... that's why I included the second sentence?

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I think you upset the americans ๐Ÿ˜†

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Meta is a threat to the platform though.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

The fediverse is an emerging threat. It's not ready yet, but it's on the right trajectory. Every time there's angst on some other platform, the fediverse get's a bump. Fediverse is not a real competitor yet, perhaps it never will be, but for meta it's sensible to establish a presence here in the short term, because it may be much more difficult later.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

People have been writing about this ad nauseum. It's the embrace, extend, extinguish strategy. Join fediverse, extend the spec with so that not all clients are compatible with all features, repeat as necessary until everyone is using your client, finally drop compatibility with other clients.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

created an account on a popular well federated server

Why would they do that?

They would create a custom instance.

[โ€“] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago

Surely you're aware of the embrace, extend, extinguish corporate strategy.

People only get to decide what they want from their platform until facebook starts extending the spec. Then your client will become incompatible with some posts, and so on and so forth.

In summary, it's a threat to the platform itself.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Do you think any users would populate a place that's over-run with trash?

If there are, would they be the type of users who would populate communities you would feel comfortable in?

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Sure, but where is the line between spam and threads content? If the content a community produces is heavily manipulated, isn't that undesirable for all the same reasons as spam ?

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Polling isn't as simple as adding up responses and reporting the percentages.

They use complex methodologies to account for inaccuracies exactly like your good self.

That's not to say that polls are necessarily accurate - clearly they aren't, but to say "polls won't capture voters like me" is incorrect.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (7 children)

If there was a bot that just flooded All with far right talking points, do you think admins ought to block that or leave it to the users?

What if it was far right mixed in with cat memes?

What if it started more slowly like a few posts an hour and then ramped up over 6 months to be 1000s of posts per hour?

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Exactly, I hereby decide that I would like to ignore corporate efforts to undermine this burgeoning new platform. I furthermore reserve the right to complain about the loss of said platform in future years by claiming that it's everyone elses fault for allowing corporate encroachment.

view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ