FunnyUsername

The supposed contents of the infamous "pee tape"

I think plants are a little less cool now that cloning is so easy and prevalent. It's great you can get anything for cheap now, but it does make things feel less special to me. More trivial.

Iunno, man. If you ask me, they're just laundering emotions. Not producing any new or interesting feelings. There is no empathy, it's only a mirror. But I hope you and your AI live a long happy life together.

I played Beavis and Butthead in Virtual Stupidity, 1995 last time i streamed to nobody

Well said. "Art launderers" is the best ai descriptor I've come across so far.

I absolutely can. Parody is an art form, which is something that can exclusively only be created by human beings. AI is an art laundering service. Not an artist.

The law should reflect that these companies need to be first granted permission to use datasets by the rights holders, and creative commons licenses need to be given an opportunity to opt out of being crawled for these datasets. Anything else is wrong. Machines are not humans. Creative common copyright law was not written with the concept of machines being "consumers". These companies took advantage of the sudden emergence of these models and the delay of law in holding their hunger for data in check. They need to be held accountable for their theft.

What makes you think copyright law doesn't apply to companies using copy written data to sell and profit off of? That is not the case. Also, you're putting words in my mouth. Feel free to read my other replies on this thread but I don't feel like repeating myself, but I think it's clear I'm not saying computers aren't allowed to process data that's absurd.

You can try to equate humans to computers all day, and you can even pass laws that says they're the same thing. That does not make it true. A company using software to profit off data they have not licensed (whether it's public or not does not matter! That is not how copyright law works!) is theft.

Please try to sell DVDs of markiplier's publicaly available YouTube content and tell people how you're allowed to because it's publicaly available.

For no reason at all I started reading old Archie comics from the very first printing a couple years ago, and I really really appreciated this post

In actual computer science you talk about AI all the time as well but it's not actually intelligent is it? It's just SmarterChild 2.0 and literally has no idea what word it said just before it's current one. Not intelligent. Words are often used inappropriately. The only thing computers can consume is data and electricity by definition, and consuming data is not the same as implementing it in a language (or visual) model that you intend to profit from. This is data theft, unless properly licensed.

Consuming is not the same thing as training. A machine is not a consumer, it is a tool.