[-] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago

When Dobbs was on the line not one of the tens of millions of them even tried to kill the scotus.

I also like to point out how afraid libs were when Trump was threatening to nuke the DPRK and possibly start WW3. Not a single lib thought to say “maybe we should strip the power away from a president to be able to do this sort of thing”. But libs would rather die in a nuclear winter than consider fundamentally altering power relationships in government.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago

As someone familiar with government bureaucracy, both personally and from a historical perspective, I don’t think Project 2025 is all that feasible, at least in the short/medium term.

These government bureaucracies are massive. There is no way you can hire some wine mom from Palm Beach be an environmental scientist at the EPA just because she loves Trump. Government jobs usually require things like interview panels to score people. These jobs have minimum requirements, etc that you can’t actually just bypass. And there so many layers of management. Sure, Trump can staff these agencies with his people at the very top, but that’s something GOP presidents have always done (and Democrats put industry-friendly people in there anyway).

But more importantly, these bureaucracies have their own “immune systems” that prevent attempts to subvert their power. Put it this way: let’s say we got a commie elected to president. The first thing we would want to do is “project 2025” the CIA, right? Just imagine how hard that would actually be, and how effective the CIA would be in largely thwarting this attempt.

[-] [email protected] 45 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Afghanistan should be negative. As the US-backed government collapsed to the Taliban, the US decided to keep like $7 billion of the country’s reserves. US kept most of it but graciously decided to give back a fraction of their own money but only in food, not in cash.

Death to America.

[-] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago

I wish you could short Michelle Obama here. IIRC she has never expressed interest in running for president and by all accounts frankly seemed to be more than done with it all by the time her husband left office. And yet she’s always near the top of the list on these things, I don’t get it.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

IIRC Ben is living in China right now getting a Marxism degree.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago

As of 2019, Abigail Disney's net worth was approximately $120 million.

While that’s still obscenely wealthy, that’s less than what a single Olson Twin is worth. Why is Abigail Disney getting all this media attention for withholding donations when she’s probably all that close to power, certainly not compared to all the many billionaires who donate to the DNC.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

tbf I posted a video of her playing The Frog Galliard on harpsichord just because I thought it was pretty dope.

[-] [email protected] 53 points 1 week ago

By all accounts, he is actually more Zionist than Biden or Trump, if that’s even possible.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

Check out W’s failed appointee Harriet Miers. Technically she had a law degree but functionally she was an office manager for a law firm tied to the Bush family. W nominated her and she had trouble with basic legal questions on the intake form. Orrin Hatch pulled W aside and said she’d never be approved, so she withdrew.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Don’t know how I missed those.

[-] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago

Even assuming the absolute worst, none of that compares to the indoctrination I got at evangelical church camp in the USA.

[-] [email protected] 53 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

St. Louis is cursed to being home to the worst US corporations, relative to its size at least. Boeing’s military division is there (one of the biggest employers there, former McDonnell Douglas). Mallinckrodt, Monsanto (poisoning our food + inventing agricultural IP), ABInBev (shitty American beer), and Peabody/Arch Coal (coal mining and they also figured out how a corporation can legally shed their pension liabilities. And they all love their performative liberal bullshit. And you can add Michael Brown and all the racism on top of it, too.

84
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Hate that it’s Ted Cruz, though.

82
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

To clarify something, I’m not some boug. I worked at a job for years where they put money into a 401k as part of the benefits, and I was there long enough that it vested. So I have a few grand that’s locked up in an IRA that I can’t get into until I retire.

Here’s my simple strategy: I’m putting everything into Chinese index funds / stonk ETFs.

My rationale: it’s all about the emotional risk management.

What I mean by that statement is, in the past when one of my sports teams I root for has made it into the final round of the playoffs, I would place a small bet against them. Because if they win, I won’t care that I lost some money. But if they lose, I’ll at least have a bit more $$$ in my pocket, it’s a small consolation but it helps.

So how does this relate to China and investing? The way I see it, there’s likely one of two scenarios for where the Chinese economy will be a few decades from now when I can take that money out. Either A.) the CPC more or less just continues on with what it’s been doing since Deng. Continue to develop the productive forces, continue to rack up W after W while the west implodes on itself, and the Chinese corporations I’m invested in will do great - stonks go up and I have a nice little savings built up.

Or B.) CPC pushes the communism button in 2050 or so, they nationalize all the corporations, and I lose the whole investment. But you know what, WHO CARES?! THEY PUSHED THE BUTTON! That would literally be the best thing that I could ever see happen in my lifetime, and the last thing I would care about would be my IRA.

Seems like no matter what, I end up a winner 😎

28
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

For this hypothetical, let’s say it’s not aliens actually visiting earth. But let’s say JWST finds a planet maybe a few hundred light years away, and we can see lights and cities and maybe spaceships or stuff like that around it. So no contact, but 100% proof there’s intelligent life out there. How would humans (and different groups of humans, like conservative Christians) react to this?

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Greenleaf

joined 7 months ago