ImplyingImplications

It's honestly impressive how we went from "only nerds know tech" in gen x to "everyone knows tech" in millennials to "only nerds know tech" in gen z.

First principalmaxxing

"How can you kill that which has no life?"

Bags of sand

Guinea Bee? Bumble Pig?

He was trying to use the ol' reliable argument of "if you don't like it here then you can go back to where you came from!" Except he forgot about Native Americans.

Innuendo Studios has a series covering popular bad faith arguments called "Alt-Right Playbook". I think these kinds of arguments are used so often that even people who aren't trying to push an agenda have started using them.

Don't forget buying social media and amplifying the voices of Gotham's worst

This really grows my factory.

I was a private investigator for 20 years so I'll use my unique skillset to help you out for free. The website URL is watermarked on the top and bottom of the video in large font.

How would "here's me stalking your family" ever "win an argument" anyways???

That's why the justice didn't agree. It was a terrible argument and properly dismissed.

The context is irrelevant because nobody wants Ubisoft to fail because they don't make content that caters to them. It's a strawman argument. Does this Director of Monetization want to uplift his competitors? Absolutely not. He would love if all his competitors failed. Yet he gets on his high horse saying we must uplift his corporate venture to extract as much money as possible because we're all in this together??