MalMen

@k4r4b3y one step closer 😁

@prancing389 post not found...

@Berg @aldalire the fees in monero work diferently than bitcoin..
Monero has an dinamyc block size which means that once the blocks become full the blocksize limit will expand, this is done slowly to avoid spam just otherwise empy blocks.. also with the encrease of blocksize the fees get lower.. (I dont recall the math used here)
But that sayed, its not a perfect system but the community is willing to adapt as needed..

@Findmysec @k4r4b3y it takes time... I am slowly quiting reddit (to much noise) but mastodon don't have the content I would like to keep following yet

@gunnm @k4r4b3y its Jon of the comunity to keep the devs in check.... that being said I think it's much harder to hijack monero.... monero has a clear goal, an unstopable mean of exchange value in a private and fungible way, in bitcoin there is not an unique narrative and the narratives that it have have been changing over time

@Scolding0513 @OrangeFren not yet... they gave one week to keep trading... it will be 6 months to withdrawl

@DisgracedDoctor what governments force you is outside of the scope of monero.. they can force the business to provide viewkeys the sameway they can force them to provide bank balances... the way monero will work past seraphis + full membership signatures it will be damn dificult to analyse anything on blockchain

@trymeout @tusker In Monero there is no such thing of recovering all funds without transaction history.. Monero is not like bitcoin where you can see what transactions where spend already and you can discart them... in Monero (with some exceptions) you cant tell if a transaction has been spent or not, so nodes can never delete them, otherwise they will not know theyr existence if someone try to spend that outputs

@tusker what you are sugesting is that we can have a pruned blockchain (that already exist by the way), but in order to validate the transactions the miners nodes would have to have the full history (like we have already) is that it or I am missing anything ?

@tusker I dont think this makes sense in any layer 1... you should be able to store your value for an undefined period of time and not have to worry about it expirity date..