Realitaetsverlust

joined 5 months ago
[–] Realitaetsverlust 6 points 1 hour ago

Sometimes, I wish for god to take away my ability to read

[–] Realitaetsverlust 2 points 1 hour ago

Honestly I much prefer walking the dog in winter than during summer. Nothing is worse than going outside at midnight and still facing 28°C

[–] Realitaetsverlust 4 points 19 hours ago

It harmed Russia so either way idc. Was a win

[–] Realitaetsverlust 3 points 19 hours ago

As long as my boss is happy and satisfied, I don't give a shit. I usually work 8 hours on Monday, pretend I'm working the entire week and chill from Tuesday to Friday

[–] Realitaetsverlust 2 points 19 hours ago

Maybe its just me but I'm way too competitive to cuddle while playing nario kart

[–] Realitaetsverlust 13 points 19 hours ago

Rimworld

I just keep coming back.

[–] Realitaetsverlust 31 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Indie games are the only games worth buying.

AAA is dead in the water for the most part, maybe exept the occasional fromsoft banger

[–] Realitaetsverlust 0 points 19 hours ago

Today in "Pointless lawsuits that'll lead nowhere".

[–] Realitaetsverlust 15 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Kinda makes sense since a majority of women want a "manly man", at least thats what I see happening IRL.

[–] Realitaetsverlust 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I am german, so I am well aware of the entire situation here.

However, I don't feel you can call someone pro-AfD simply because he was opposed to islam. Again, someone who was pro-AfD wouldn't have chosen to attack a christmas market, but instead a mosque or something.

If I look through my political beliefs, there are very likely a few things in the AfD manifesto that I agree with. That doesn't make me pro-AfD. Just as there will be a few things in the green party manifesto I agree with, which does not make me pro-green.

Calling him pro-AfD is a fairly disgusting attempt of framing imo.

[–] Realitaetsverlust 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Ironically, no, it wouldn't. At least not longterm. I know many people on lemmy don't want to hear that because capitalism bad or something, but it's the reality. Do you unironically think you can just give every homeless person a home and it would all magically sort itself out? Most likely not. Homes need to be maintained, which cost money.

In order to "solve" homelessness, you need to give people the ability to fix their lives themselves. It reminds me a lot of the attempts to help africa back in the early 2000s when europe would send a lot of heavy machinery to africa to help them improve farming, but they couldn't properly maintain or use the machinery because they didn't have the technical knowledge or the machinery simply wasn't suitable, so they just left them to rust or dismantled them for parts and quick money. Instead, europe moved to an approach that would enable those people to help themselves by providing better education etc.

Just giving people free housing will not work unless you also come up with a plan to maintain said housing, which costs money, which has to be paid for. If you don't have a plan like that in place, you will probably create a highly criminal slum within a couple of months, if not weeks.

I dislike musk and most stock-market-billionaires as much as most people on here, but pretending we can just take all their wealth away and the entire world would be a beautiful place where everyone can live happy and it smells like butterscotch-pie everywhere is just an extremely immature take.

[–] Realitaetsverlust -4 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Homelessnes is not a problem you can solve with any amount of money.

view more: next ›