[-] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago

It desperately needs this. Very inflammatory tweets can get widely circulated by brigading with no real way to stop it even if it's a wildly unpopular sentiment.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago

I'd prefer a filter for blue checkmarks.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

Some besides what you're doing now which ain't working.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

Ok I didn't mean that in particular

[-] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago

What it takes to stop it.

[-] [email protected] -5 points 21 hours ago

What app stops a pre install keylogger. I'm all for hearing criticism of Signal but it's always about things they can't control.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

Y'all won't do anything.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago

You're just arguing semantics like a pedantic dweeb. In not sure how proving Gen X and Boomers are less educated than millennials disproves my point about them being the most ignorant.

Everything you've said just amounts to "nuh uh". I've posted several stats showing Boomers have less education, and have the most real estate. You've yet to produce one single fact. But you sure caught that one typo, bravo.

And you make up you're own definitions like with Reagan. I KNOW Gen X couldn't have voted for Regan. But many of them did vote for Bush Sr., Clinton, Bush Jr. and a slew of reactionary politician at every level of government.

Cope as much as you like but THE PAST IS PROLOGUE. While millennials bare some responsibility many of today's societal ills can be traced back to decisions made before their time.

And we CONTINUE see these reactionary politics from Boomers and Gen X. The average age of a Republican is 55. Squarely in the age range of Boomers and Gen X.

TL;DR Refute what I said with FACTS are shut up.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

So what, you think millennials own huge tracks of empty land? You're not a serious person.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, ignorant means you don't know things. Being educated is a HUGE indicator of that. There's exceptions but you're kidding yourself if you think it's the norm.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

All you got is ad hominem attacks and its pathetic. I'm talking about a public live stream where a lot of people would see it and potentially catch predators.

Let me counter with my own ad hominem attack. You sound like a square that doesn't go clubbing. Social people want to club where the most action is at. Not intellectually masturbate online about privacy absolution.

You act like there'd be a camera covering every square inch. A few cameras looking at the bar and dance floor would be enough. You do realize clubs and festivals broadcast live all the time right. Whoops no, no I guess you wouldn't.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I'm not going off on weird tangents. The person I responded to encouraged me to "go on" regarding the detrimental effect Boomers and Gen X have had on later generations.

And no this is demonstrably not due to some "generational wealth". It's because of reactionary housing policies that boomers enacted to benefit themselves. From redlining, to Realtor steering, to draconian eviction laws, to tax breaks, to white flight, etc etc.

You don't even necessarily see this extreme hoarding in other western countries like Japan where homes can actually be free in some circumstances.

33
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

This community is documenting the impending second collapse of the housing market with an emphasis on the US but international news is included as well.

Follow if you'd like to get the inside track on what's really going on with absurd real estate market in the US and internationally with news, studies and memes.

1
Landlords ruin everything (arstechnica.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/18232199

The rent is too dang high in Cities: Skylines 2, so the devs nuked the landlords

1
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
No one is safe (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/16480193

The diminishing returns of in-office mandates

In-person collaboration has been linked to high performance and job satisfaction, but these benefits don't increase with more days spent in the office.

An oft-cited reason for in-person work mandates is that they help drive connection among a team. As more employers push for four and five days in the office, rhetoric has focused on the importance of collaboration and a sense of belonging that some leaders believe can only be fostered in a shared physical environment.

Yet some data shows the number of days people attend the office doesn't directly correlate to that sense of connection. In fact, there's only a 1% difference in the number of employees who say they feel connected to their organisation working four or five days a week as compared to those working two or three days on site. That slim leading edge went to the latter group, at 60%, according to a global survey of 1,115 employees by London-based workplace insights firm Leesman, seen by the BBC.

"There just doesn't seem to be huge gains from the number of days people are in the office," says Allison English, deputy CEO of Leesman. "It's about the quality, not quantity, of time that matters. In fact, we see that the greater the number of in-person days, the less the worker is generally satisfied with work-life balanceimpacting engagement and their connection to the organisation."

1
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/14576954

hmmm

1
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/16455656

That’ll be Why the Median is Barely Over 40

1
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
view more: next ›

SeattleRain

joined 2 months ago
MODERATOR OF