It seems like his concern is something he doesn't want to be clear about.
Serinus
Cool. Hamas fighting a war against oppressors instead of the times they're targeting civilians or attempting to commit their own genocide.
There are ways to start a not for profit bar that may not donate for the first several years and have it be legit. This isn't one of them.
If you buy a building, hire staff, and go a million or two dollars into debt, it can be okay to recoup that money before starting to donate and still be a non-profit.
Telling customers 10% goes to charity means right now, not after your debts are paid. Telling them profits go to charity means all profits, not 10%.
People do not want to hear, ‘Well, actually the economy is good.’”
In four years these same people are going to line hearing that, regardless of reality.
It's not about the message. It's about the color of the team saying it. Red, orange, and white over blue, brown, and white.
Picture looks adversarial af. Caption: They're all friends.
Yeah, okay.
Just as likely he's now sending a pittance to other people in order to say he wasn't targeting a group. You can send out a LOT of hundred dollar bills before you approach a billion.
What was the "gut" thing again?
Yeah, there's another one not marked that's been up for hours. "Tulsi Gabbard to be Director of National Security." Yeah, okay. Funny joke.
For the uninformed, this is funny (and sarcasm) because there's mountains of evidence of them together. Besides, you know, picking him for AG. But he tries this defense all the time anyway, and people actually believe it.
Just like explicitly Trump calling up members of Congress to kill the bipartisan border bill, and then blaming the Democrats for not passing a border bill. They sold that one on the campaign trail too, and it worked.
Sources
- Matt Gaetz Facebook video of Trump thanking him,
- [Gaetz Introduces Resolution Absolving Trump's Role in Jan. 6 Insurrection] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rog9Tm7hqS4)
No. This isn't a thing you need to "both sides". There is nuance.
It's bad for Netanyahu if settlers die. It's good for him if Israeli people are threatened. His appeal is that he'll protect them (including through killing others). If he fails to do that too often, he loses.
Hamas is fine with people on their side dying. Israel is not. Israel is accomplishing their goals through genocide. Palestinians would love to genocide Israel, but they can't. That doesn't excuse Israel actually currently committing genocide.
And there's no excuse for settling land in areas that will keep Israelis in danger. The first settlers are Zionists, later people living there won't (necessarily) be Zionists.
They don't like algorithms. They want you to select which content you see.
That's all I've got. Mastodon is a better, more open tech. And it's pretty easy to get set up, relatively. It's insane that companies haven't jumped on it.
You don't even have to quit Twitter. You can just post to more than one place and give people the option.
I'm sure a certain narrative will be curated here.