Trumps administration will likely start out with a lot of power hungry egomaniac freaks, and then with its very high turnover, trump loyalists will be filtered through, like they did in their first term.
Competence doesn't really matter.
Trumps administration will likely start out with a lot of power hungry egomaniac freaks, and then with its very high turnover, trump loyalists will be filtered through, like they did in their first term.
Competence doesn't really matter.
Konservativ ist die Zukunft und Veränderungen auszublenden.
NixOS would be like brewing coffee with laboratory equipment and then setting it up for automation.
From the two unsuccessful ban trials of the NPD, I do not have much hope of this one succeeding. Sadly.
Ich hoffe auf keine gesetzliche Grenze, lass die Ärzte entscheiden wehn man wie am besten retten kann im Fall einer probematischen Geburt.
Wenn sich Ärtzte jetzt strafbar machen könnten, wenn sie in bestimmter weise eingreifen, dann weigern diese sich vielleicht komplett.
Well, in that way it is a classic open source software, very powerful but a bit difficult to use.
I rather have features I need hidden behind a cryptic interface, then not have them.
I also normally carry around a power bank, and sometimes have to recharge my phone at lunch, when using it intensively. That seems just normal to me at this point.
I prefer OSMand over Organic Maps, because it has much more features, just the map renderer isn't as pretty.
But I mostly use it for pedestrian and bike navigation. But I think car navigation works very well as well.
Also, if the map data isn't so great in your region, you can try playing StreetComplete and help improve it yourself.
OSM is the Wikipedia of map data, and offers likely the most detailed map that we have.
A lot of this is a game of probabilities, which I don't really think we have.
For instance if a normal human driver, without any automation, can prevent 80% of dangerous situations, but the automation can only prevent 50%, and in those situations the human savety driver can prevent only another 50%, because of inattention, this results in just 75% of dangerous situations prevented and the automation is worse.
Maybe someone knows the real probabilities, I don't.
What does my comment have to do with me?
i just say what normally happens, and is happening to some degree in certain parts of the left. They often overly generally blame "men" for everything, forgetting that they also are victims in the same system. And that everyone should work together to continuously improve the system.
The leftist critique should always be directed to how to improve the system for everyone, not directed against certain individuals or groups. If they put blame onto certain groups of people, they are right-wing. Because this is how the right thinks. Individuals or groups of people are always at fault for the right.
Nobody is born evil, we need to understand why people do certain things we do not like them to do. For instance people are conservative, often because they are afraid of things. Maybe men currently might struggle to find their place in the modern world, then left needs to acknowledge that and try to improve the system, so that they do not need to have that fear anymore. Sure, maybe other injustices in the system are more important, but do not complain if affected people become upset, and do not behave like you wanted them to.
You know, critiquing and improving the system.
If the goal here is to punish "men" until they behave, this will just cause them to be more angry at the perceived injustice and move more to the right.
Exactly, stuff like this will just drive more people to the extreme right. Great job...
They should probably try to fix the issues that caused the population to vote for him.
It never about "fixing" or "killing" individuals, but about systems that do not work for some people.