I rarely trust top results from google, since I'm uncertain if I somehow missed the tiny gray text saying that it's an add.

When I'm uncertain about something, I'll often go with "I'm 76.5% sure that..." (Or some other number which reflects my confidence).

Those numbers are worringly low. I have been assuming that the vocal group, the ones taking to the streets with their little hats and grumpy faces, were a very verbal minority. I'd expect way more than 1/3 to prefer some other candidate. Not great.

I love how they are displaying their parking skills

Right. Well, I have a question:

Why?

This old picture has the writing "Easter eggs for Hitler" on the bombs. I think the use case makes the biggest difference for whether writing a message is perceived as sinister. A bomb which is being sent to someone who has been confirmed to regularily attack civilian targets is not great.

A spherical tray should work. Make sure it has enough mass to make its gravitational field hold on to the batter and suspend it in the oven using magnets.

The real answer would be "don't". Have a decent whitelist dor training data with reliable data. Don't just add every orifice of the internet (like reddit) to the training data. Limitations would be good in this case.

How can you mention all those weird variations of bikes without mentioning a normal bike?

Dang, the pronoun discussion has lead me to forget that pronouns include I, we and they. I'll make use of this.

"What are your pronouns?"

"I / me"

This is how flat earth society was formed.

"Have you invested in crypto?"

Do you think anyone anywhere will misunderstand this as investing in cryptographic research/development?

The mainstream usage of the word isn't always aligned with what is good for society or even the original usage of the word.