[-] [email protected] 44 points 4 days ago

I'm converting to PMC Maoism.

[-] [email protected] 54 points 4 days ago

I love (by which I mean hate) how 'purity test' has just come to refer to having any uncompromising moral position whatsoever.

Again it's one of those cliche situations of the left wants to not kill Palestinians and the right wants to kill all of them and liberals are like, "but you gotta compromise to get what you want ..."

Though hearing the Biden superpacs are focusing almost entirely on digital stuff makes me hope that most of these are just shills, even the downvoting is inconsistent, like the horde missed some comments or misinterpreted some of the commenters to think they're pro-lib when they're not. Very strange either way.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 4 days ago

Oh it's absolutely pathetic. They should have cut ties with her when she backpedaled her first marginally pro-palestine interview shortly after she got elected (if I'm remembering correctly, could've been before). But the DSA isn't a serious organization so we get this too little too late severing.

[-] [email protected] 39 points 4 days ago

File those performative articles of impeachment against Clarence Thomas.

And, "it's what the unions wanted!" about the railroad strike.

But that's the kind of power we lost! How horrible ...

[-] [email protected] 52 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

There was one berating the OOP about how, now that they've cut ties with her, the DSA has less power. Like how could they be so stupid as to do that.

Completely missing the point that they never had her 'power' to begin with, I swear people didn't use to be this dumb about politics but here we are ...

103
submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Holding electeds even marginally accountable is bad acktuallllyyy ... This is just so exhausting.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Who could've thought that Leigh Phillips would write something like this ... lol. Is he even pretending to be a socialist still?

edit: I don't know how to spell

[-] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

Oh yeah it wouldn't change a god damn thing, arguing about it would be literally pointless. Same thing as arguing against free-will, either it exists or it doesn't. Debating it is pointless, finding out one way or the other is pointless since in both cases nothing changes.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 6 days ago

Fortunately there's a new funny science youtube who also seems to have at least decent if not verging on pretty good politics.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

From when I still watched her, Superdeterminism seemed to be her thing. Its a non-theory, totally unprovable. I don't think she's a MOND believer, could be wrong though but either way she's not a cosmologist.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

It was the NIF two years ago but it's also not going to be generating power ever, it was just a demonstration/proof of concept.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 3 weeks ago

I'll give it a shot.

  1. China can discipline individual capitalists but it cannot discipline Capital (in more vulgar terms, international capital).

  2. Since it lacks this capacity China is therefore dependent on Capital cooperating with it to achieve its vision of Socialism.

  3. Thus it will not achieve Socialism with its current trajectory.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Yes, Boeing made the first stage of the Saturn V.

'Defense contractor' and 'small' are oxymorons. The old guard, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Rocketdyne, etc. all got used to cost-plus contracts and so geared their production assuming they'd always have them. Now they're big mad that SpaceX and others are upstaging them in cost, performance and scale because, surprise surprise, decades of no accountability doesn't foster competence.

Rocket production has always been a public/private partnership, the only difference is SpaceX takes commercial customers too, not just governments (or companies who basically are part of their government).

view more: next ›

impartial_fanboy

joined 4 years ago