Timezones are one thing. Accounting for relativistic drift will be a whole different problem.
I use the wayback machine a lot. The actual archive less often, but I've definitely used it to look up things that are otherwise hard to find.
And the argument was if there's meaning behind what they generate. That argument applies to AGIs too. It's a deeply debated philosophical question. What is meaning? Is our own thought pattern deterministic, and if it is, how do we know there's any meaning behind our own actions?
Me? How can I move goalposts in a single sentence? We've had no previous conversation... And I'm not agreeing with the previous poster either..
I was going to add a note about the exception of video games but decided I'm digressing
AI hasn't been redefined. For people familiar with the field it has always been a broad term meaning code that learns (and subdivided in many types of AI), and for people unfamiliar with the field it has always been a term synonymous with AGI. So when people in the former category put out a product and label it as AI, people in the latter category then run with it using their own definition.
For a long time ML had been the popular buzzword in tech and people outside the field didn't care about it. But then Google and OpenAI started calling ML and LLMs simply "AI" and that became the popular buzzword. And when everyone is talking about AI, and most people conflate that with AGI, the results are funny and scary at the same time.
You use toilet paper to dry off? Why not a towel?
Isn't his skull adamantium? Can it be sliced in half?
Ah, didn't think of them being vertical. A very tall and heavy crown, but doable.
Why remake movies that are already good?
You know whoever made that is carrying it around with them just to make that joke when someone asks for a lighter.