I am. Now that I've learned a bit more about politics and animal agriculture subsidies, I think that it makes more of a difference to be involved in animal liberation activism than it actually does to be vegan. (Obvs both is best.) Either way there's an incomprehensible industrial moral horror going on and everybody should do something about it.
I suppose bikers will go for routine checkups and respond to the doctor, "Jeez, I've been riding for ten years and nobody ever told me it was dangerous!"
The lessons are the same from every public health concern: risky sex, obesity epidemic, smoking. Badgering people is really fucking annoying for everybody involved - so annoying that they'll have worse healthcare outcomes in general - and basically nobody will make lifestyle changes because of it. The most you can do with non-structural solutions is get people to take prophylactics or wear a helmet.
Your risk of death is 100%. I drive a convertible even though it is much more dangerous than a sedan in a rollover or T-bone. Many of us here shoot guns, do direct action, have no health insurance, etc. As long as they're registered organ donors, why should doctors hassle bikers? Bikers know the risk better than the general population, they just want it more.
Bicycle deaths per mile: ~10 per 100M miles Motorcycle deaths per mile: ~20 per 100M miles
IMO this shows that they're more dangerous, but primarily because you can go a lot further on a motorcycle. Basically 100% of the danger from riding a bicycle comes from cars. In contrast, it's quite practical to kill yourself on a motorcycle without external intervention. So, if you have already chosen a mode of transportation, behavioral choices on a motorcycle offer much more control over where you fall within that mode's risk spectrum. Wearing a helmet and taking a class make way more difference on a motorcycle, and that's borne out by the contributing factors to fatal accidents /u/nat_turner_overdrive has posted elsewhere in the thread. Seems quite possible that the per-mile risk of a motorcycle rider doing everything right is comparable to that of the average bicyclist. Biking in cities is stupid dangerous of course, every cyclist I know has been hit, but that's a problem with cars not an intrinsic thing.
i joined a socialist org for mass politics hopium, and also did enough networking in anarchist/mutual aid circles to find a couple promising direct action projects
misinterpreted as
trying to learn about the period but struggle with how dense it [the period] can be at times
IMO no, for two reasons:
- reading code is harder than writing it. If the AI writes you a standard implementation, you still have to read it to make sure it's correct. So that's more work than just doing it yourself
- AI will produce code that looks right. Since it can't understand anything that's all it does, next most likely token == most correct-looking solution. But when the obvious solution is not the right one, you now have deceptively incorrect code, specifically and solely designed to look correct.
I've never used Copilot myself but pair programmed with someone who used it, and it seemed like he spent more time messing with the output than it would have taken to write it himself.
No TikTok, no Kaspersky, I'm excited to live behind the Great Firewall of America.
simply show them your phone background, the BRICS waifu picture
Nice work! Get your "user testing" time in and enjoy.
seems like it'd be hard to get reliable data on this. anybody here in the fentanyl business? im not a cop :)
Mullvad fits your criteria. Proton is annoying to use on phones I think but they do have a free VPN.
Really there's very little that a VPN is suitable for over TOR. Probably, if you can't run it over TOR it's not secure over a VPN either.