He was specifically instructed in the linked pr to change the license terms, I don't see how that makes him the asshole here.
osaerisxero
This seems exactly right to me. More of a "we wanted to win, not burn down the board". Take the W and hope it can convince some holdovers from that era to stay home, if not vote the same way.
this user survey could help
Sigbs point to no
Fixing the sign would cut into the executives' yacht fund
Definitely, like the refreshing energy of GamerSupps energy drink powder and it's many flavors like Guacamole Gamer Fart 9000
100% this is dayglo yarn
That was in no way clear
Oh no, that terrible anime subs and content. Quick everyone post more fully qualified !links to more of these groups so i can avoid them, there's only been a few in the thread so far
I'm excited to hear about how the ownership group has decided to ratfuck the Annapurna brand
Co-op is generally considered more correct, yes
Good day for the Satisfactory 1.0 release then
So, i started working for Cisco shortly after this went down, and it actually changed basically everything about their global supply chain. Anywhere that devices which would be provided to customers were at rest were blanketed by cameras and literally all procurement shipping was changed to overnight (or first overnight for anything near a warehouse) to try to make it functionally impossible to execute the same attack again.
Talk shit about their products all you want, but they were unironically angry about this issue and in classic Cisco fashion threw money at the problem until it went away.