tmjaea

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Nice, manufactured almost two years after first usage 🤯

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Because canonical removed packages from apt to prevent users to install their apps from apt instead. Firefox for example.

Firefox from Apt is a link to a snap!

https://askubuntu.com/questions/1399383/how-to-install-firefox-as-a-traditional-deb-package-without-snap-in-ubuntu-22

This is some bullshit level activity that I do not want.

I moved away from Microsoft to not have to deal with such an annoyance. Now canonical is doing it to their users.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Avoiding snaps on Ubuntu sadly is not an option anymore. Maybe go for pop!_os Instead of Ubuntu.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

The Martian

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I think in some years it's considered a common requirement. Just compare it to pipelines. Electricity is way more easily transported and still we built tens of thousands of [preferred unit for distance measurement] of tubes on to the landscape.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

There are already some charging stations in Germany offering 400kW. Still 16 minutes though. 800kW is just insane. CCS is currently capped at 500kW, so you would need MCS which is planned for trucks.

[–] [email protected] 160 points 4 weeks ago (12 children)

As a European I can't grasp this concept. As if sickness is something somebody chooses by will.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

You put up a lot of US election stuff yourself?!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

The hills have eyes

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Where Nokia?

24
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Hi,

I've got a network setup consisting of 3 proxmox servers of which two have a 10Gbe interface. All interfaces are RJ45 copper ports.

So far I've got two qnap switches with 2 10Gbe and 5 2.5Gbe portss. They are connected to each other via one of the 10Gbe ports, and one of the servers on the other one.

This setup is working flawlessly, iperf measurements show 9.4gbit/s in both directions.

Recently I tried to increase my network for future expansion and bought a trendnet switch with 5 10Gbe ports.

Weird problems occurred and as they were also described in some amazon reviews I returned the switch and bought another one, this time a 4port 10Gbe switch from ubiquity.

Again there are problems. This time one direction seems to be at 10gbit/s as expected while the other direction (between the same two servers) is limited to 1gbit/s. The connection to the third server shows the same problem (one direction 2.5gbit/s and the other one limited to 1gbit/s).

All wires are connected correctly and as there is no problem on the qnap switches I do believe that there is no hardware problem on the cable/NIC side.

However I'm not sure if this is this just bad luck or some deep network problem I don't understand.

Maybe someone has an idea?

view more: next ›