this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
532 points (98.9% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3818 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We don't have a healthcare system in the US, we have an insurance racket.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

But many people keep voting for candidates who don’t want change, so no change it is.

Candidates who want change are rare.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And when someone does come along, the obstructionist party torpedoes it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Truman's fair deal, yeah

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Most Democrats I know want a different healthcare system, including myself. I always find a candidate to vote for who want the same.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Most Democrats I know want a different healthcare system, including myself.

Most Democrats I know aren't candidates.

I always find a candidate to vote for who want the same.

It's easy to find a Democratic candidate who says they want change.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It takes 60 votes in the Senate for real reform. The Democrats never have 60 votes, so it's incremental change. It's a marathon, not a sprint.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It takes 60 votes in the Senate for real reform.

Because Democrats won't end the filibuster.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The end of the filibuster for Democrats means the end of the filibuster for Republicans...think about it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We're so scared of what Republicans might do that we let Roe die.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Roe died at the hands of the Supreme Court and Trump based on what happened during a Republican majority. Justice approval only requires a simple Senate majority. Filibuster or no filibuster. Result would have been the same.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Could have expanded the courts except for the filibuster.