398
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The U.S. Supreme Court's immunity decision has reportedly emboldened the presumptive GOP nominee to pursue his far-right agenda and authoritarian aims "without fear of punishment or restraint."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Could Biden use that ruling to just stay president, but leave them the opportunity to repeal it? Illustrate how dangerous it is while still giving the system a chance to self-correct.

[-] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago
[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago

Yep, the Court did this all to set the stage for Trump knowing that Biden (or Dems) wouldn't abuse the new power.

But since they aren't going to abuse it they should be on every news station every night till the election explaining the danger of the Court. Hold press conferences everyday, make the Republicans have to take a stance on a Supreme Court writing new law instead of adjudicating cases like they are supposed to be doing. Make it so everyone that doesn't normally follow the news finds out they just set the stage for Trump (or the next even further right fascist) winning.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

The thing is, the Dems CANT abuse the power. If they do, they'll get crucified by both sides for it. And that's what the Republicans want. They're simultaneously making it so they'll stay in power when its their turn, and daring the Dems to do it knowing it won't go well for them. Its a win-win in their eyes. Especially while you have some of your people sitting on the highest court in the country.

And this is the flaw with a two-party system. If one party decides to play dirty, the other is either forced to play just as dirty to keep up, (devolving into anarchy) or trying to play by the rules and getting blocked by the other team at every turn.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

IF Trump actually wins the election then I hope Biden goes full scorched earth with the powers that the SCOTUS granted. He’ll have nothing to lose at that point.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

He won't though, because he's basically a moderate Republican that wants to both sides everything. He's afraid to offend the same people stabbing him in the back.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

That's why he should leave the door open for scotus to repeal their decision; and be VERY vocal about exactly what he's doing. "I am 100% abusing this new power granted by the scotus in order to shine the spotlight on just how dangerous it is; consider the damage I could be doing right now if my intent was malicious. What I'll do instead is wait for the scotus to wake up and revise their incredibly bad decision, concluding the power I shouldn't have in the first place and forcing me to step down as my position requires."

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

No. The ruling seems to have said that he can do anything he likes in his capacity as president, and he can't be convicted of any criminal offence for it. It didn't say that the people around him would have to go along with it, or that they'd be immune from prosecution.

It also left convenient wriggle room for the court to arbitrarily decide what constituted "official" actions, rather than him doing something privately, so they've effectively granted themselves a get out of jail free card to decide case-by-case in the future

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

The president has the power to pardon the people around him.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

True, I didn't consider that. He'd still have to convince them though, which would be easier said than done if he wanted to entirely disregard the constitution

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I have confidence in the ability of someone like trump to surround himself with exactly the type of people who would gladly take such leaps.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

As someone pointed out to me, it's federal crimes.

So if he asks you to do something that he's shielded from, but is a state crime, youre SOL

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Murder is generally a state offense, but since D.C. is a Federal district, I'm pretty sure murders that occur there would be pardonable.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Dear Mr Person I Want to Murder

It would be lovely if you could come visit me in DC. I have a great ~~murder~~ opportunity I'd like to discuss with you

Sincerely Trump

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I think you lost the discussion thread a little bit. We're talking about what Biden could do about the corrupt Supreme Court justices. They're definitely in D.C. already.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not really.

Pardons come up, I mention federal only, you mention murder, and then I make a joke about it.

You think Biden is gonna murder someone?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

You think Biden is gonna murder someone?

LOL, no.

But I do think that the fascist SCOTUS judges just gave him that power, and that Biden demonstrating just how terrible a power it is by using it to get rid of them might be the only way to get the decisions overturned and stop the US from becoming a dictatorship.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

The only two ways are pretty much what you said, or a massive blue wave in November that gives the dems a supermajority in the senate and a majority in the house.

AKA the USA is fucked.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago
this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
398 points (98.3% liked)

politics

18138 readers
3684 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS