politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Vance really was a horrible choice for a running mate. I've been wondering why Trump chose him, for many of the reasons this article outlines. But as with anything and everything Trump related, there is no coherent rationale. It all boils down to money, obedience, ego-stroking, and exploitation of the rubes.
No sane person would be on a ticket with Trump at this point. All they have is utter whackjobs.
I figure he went to Trump, told him he'd do whatever he was told, and he'd appeal to younger people. Trump probably cut him off and said you had me at" whatever you want"
All that's left as a recruiting pool are people who know nothing about Trump, people who are too dumb to realize they are disposable at the first convenience, and people who failed their way up into his orbit and have been so shielded from consequence that they can't conceive of something not working out in their favor.
this is what most people have the hardest time with. everyone needs to drop the assumption that anything ever needs to make sense to republicans. normal people, most people, need things to make sense. 100% not the case with republicans. when you have the capacity to replace actual reality with whatever bullshit fantasy reality trump happened to pull out of his ass just now, then everything that comprised your world before that moment goes away. there is no contradiction, no "cognitive dissonance."
like you said, it's about the money and the power. it seems like it should be more than that, but it's not
He chose Pence and Vance because their names have 5 letters just like his and they're symmetrical on campaign signs. I don't think there's any deeper logic. He doesn't care who it is as long as they're "loyal" and will help potentially steal an election.
Maybe the party let him choose Vance because they’re letting Trump sabotage himself because they see the writing on the wall, and think they just need to let this stupidity play out…? That, or they’ve well and truly given up on the Democratic process, and their plan A has become “just try to stage another coup”, so they went for the most virulent, crazy VP they could find.
No, they’ve spent years purging anyone who would say no to Trump.
It’s probably the most obvious reason, money.
It's the eye liner.