this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
402 points (97.9% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4670 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump has been throwing a prolonged tantrum, as he struggles to accept that he is no longer running against President Joe Biden. 

The former president and convicted felon has become increasingly distressed at the state of his campaign, according to a Washington Post report published Thursday. 

As Vice President Kamala Harris has relaunched the Democratic Party’s campaign, Trump saw his fundraising edge dissipate under the shadow of her $310 million influx in July. At the same time, his campaign has struggled to find its footing in the new matchup, leaving some close to the campaign wondering how it was possible they were so ill prepared, according to the *Post. *

After flying so high at the Republican National Convention in July, it seems that Trump has had a hard time adjusting to the fact that his fight is not over. 

“It’s unfair that I beat him and now I have to beat her too,” Trump told an ally in a phone call last weekend, according to the Post.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 month ago (5 children)

We can all make fun of him but I think he is setting the stage to call the election unfair and unlawful when he eventually loses, be careful.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not to say this isn't true, but the 2024 count probably also includes his continued whining about the 2020 election. It's all part of the same thing, but it's blurrier than the other two metrics.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Notes: The Times’s analysis counted specific references to “election interference,” “rigging,” “stealing,” “cheating” and related terms, as well as references to voter fraud, in posts on Twitter (now X) and Truth Social; at campaign events; and in interviews in the 2016, 2020 and 2024 election cycles. The analysis most likely represents an undercount of the number of times the former president has baselessly sown doubt about election fairness or integrity. Some transcripts were provided by Roll Call Factba.se.

https://archive.ph/Ihhs6

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Um...ok? That really only supports what I said - there was no distinction between which election he was talking about.

The Times has documented more than 500 campaign events, social media posts and interviews during the 2024 cycle in which Mr. Trump falsely accused Democrats or others of trying to “rig,” “cheat,” “steal” or otherwise “influence” the next election — or of having done so in 2020.

In terms of pure numbers, that's gonna inflate the stats.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Um…ok? Go argue with the ny times, I’m just providing the info that was attached to the image.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I'm not arguing with anybody. Just pointing out a notable difference in the sets of data.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He tapped an outside contractor to come up with the governance and policy plan. They basically delivered him a 900 page authoritarian how-to manual.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

That's the decoy manual, he really plans to use a subscription based manual called Vladimir Putin.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

Cheating the vote obviously has legs, but whining that it's unfair he has to run against someone he doesn't want to isn't going to hit the same. He is really losing his edge and getting slow-witted, and it really looks to me like maga is running out of gas, and I don't think there is anyone out there who can replace Trump to pour fuel on the fire.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

He's no longer in the position to keep the military away for his insurrection. They will be there in force and any bullshit magats think they're going to pull is going to be snuffed out quicker than he can inhale a bigmac.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Unless he somehow gets the whole US military to stage a coup for him, we’ll be just fine and get rid of a lot of dead weight in the process.