this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
40 points (75.6% liked)

Technology

57435 readers
3274 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Microwaving delivers a triple whammy: heat, UV irradiation, and hydrolysis

Microwave ovens do not generate ultraviolet light. They operate in the, well, microwave region of the electromagnetic spectrum.

I'm not saying microwaving plastic poses no risks, but this mistake makes me doubt the veracity of some of the more sensationalist claims in the article.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Wired articles are generally about interesting topics but take a sensationalist click-bait approach. I usually just skim the headline and look up the info somewhere more reputable if it sounds important.

For example, here's some info from the USDA:

Plastic storage containers such as margarine tubs, take-out containers, whipped topping bowls, and other one-time use containers should not be used in microwave ovens. These containers can warp or melt, possibly causing harmful chemicals to migrate into the food.
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/node/3355

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So...
Don't microwave plastics that were not designed to be microwaved.
Ground breaking.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In a past study, I saw that even microwave-safe plastics leak harmful chemicals into the food

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Perhaps, but that's not what this research has concluded.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Makes sense, hydrocarbons and heat generally means cancer. They like to make all kinds of things that your body doesn't like.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

causing harmful chemicals to migrate into the food

damn immigrants taking our food

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

THEY TOOK JER FOOD!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

So it's only a problem if you melt your bowl. Sounds like a nothing

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So in theory so long as you don’t microwave too long you should be fine? I’ve never left a plastic container in long enough for it to warp or melt

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Not really, even if it gets hot but doesn't warp it can still release harmful chemicals. I don't think it's as hard of a rule as not microwaving metal but it should definitely be minimized.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It also says they microwaved the baby food in its plastic container for 3 minutes on High before checking to see the amount of microplastics in the results.

Not sure about you guys, but I've had some experience with baby food in the last decade and can confirm that is FUCKING INSANE!

Baby food is for... well, babies. And therefore is in baby portions. Like an ounce or two of easily digestible liquids, like liquified peas. Putting a couple ounces of liquid peas in the microwave for 3 minutes on High is not going to end well, no matter what type of container you're using.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

"We need a sensationalist headline to rile people up" "Ok, I'll get ChatGPT to whip up some bullshit about microwaving plastic and how it fucks up all the food!" "Awesome"

"Hey boss, we got called out by people who have common sense" "Oh well, they're not our target audience anyway, our targeted demographic will forget all about this when you post the next article, they have the memory of goldfish, fuck em"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The linked study itself doesn’t make that claim either although I didn’t pay to see the detailed version.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

So xrays basically? 😏