this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
364 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2818 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honestly it baffles me how he’s not been charged with something that puts him away for a long damn time. He’s like, overtly traitorous. It’s not ambiguous. It’s not a grey area.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What I mean is that he’s continued to do traitorous shit since being pardoned.

Also, the “fuck you, official act” defense is now a thing, so Biden could totally just personally off him, since he’s very clearly a domestic enemy, and defending the republic enemies foreign and domestic is literally in the oath of office.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Why not also 6/9th of the court

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can we just stop with the "Democrats should just murder Republicans since the SC said Trump can do it" bullshit.

If you disagree with it, why the fuck are you guys constantly trying to further legitimize it?

Stop acting like once we do that it's just going to be smooth sailing instead of a giant cesspool of global instability.

The meme is dead. It's done.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Malicious compliance needs to be used FAR more often in the context of how deeply corrupt and blatantly partisan the Supreme Court has become. That’s the underlying gist of my point.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

if you become them, you don't win, y'all win.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You’re right, the satanic temple has never been successful at eliminating religious favor from government policy by overtly using religious law to do something shocking.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is a very clear difference between advocation of murder and creating after school Satan club.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The point is to remind them when they push evil, that same evil can be used against them. They know it's not a legitimate threat. But they also need to keep that in the back of their minds because these same people are the ones that say "without religion, what's stopping people from raping and murdering everyone?"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Using logic is not going to work, though.