chapotraphouse

13594 readers

572 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

203

The first rule of jury nullification is: don't talk about jury nullification (hexbear.net)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

If you want to nullify a law as a member of a jury, don’t talk about jury nullification:

during jury selection
during the trial
in private with any other jury member
during verdict deliberation

There is no Michael Scott moment where you “declare nullification”.

Even if the defendant is on camera and appears to commit the crime; if the defendant admitted to committing the crime; if the defendant shook your hand and said, “send me to prison, I’m guilty” — you simply decide that you did not see sufficient evidence that the defendant is guilty.

The moment you talk about jury nullification, you will be removed from the jury and/or cause a mistrial.

Just a friendly tip to those who want to serve their civic duty!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

During jury selection, they can't ask you directly about jury nullification but they'll ask something like "do you have any beliefs that will cause you to decide this case except solely on the evidenc/according to the law." If you believe in jury nullification, the answer is technically "yes" (good way to get out of jury duty). You're also supposed to follow the judge's jury instructions after the arguments.

But no one else is in that room, deliberations are private. And once the jury has rendered their verdict or whatever it's called, the matter is decided. No double jeopardy, no review.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

the law allows for jury nullification so you can say "no" and be honest checkmate atheists