this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
624 points (97.0% liked)

politics

19223 readers
3223 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Right when he's completely useless, he pushes for this. Pathetic and disingenuous.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 75 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

You're days away from the end of your entire run and now we grow morals.

This is like those old racist folks on their death beds trying to make amends to anyone and everyone in their final days.

[–] xerazal 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

He's talking about this now because he doesn't have morals. If he gave a damn he'd have pushed and passed this within his first year. This is just him trying to get some headlines before he happily steps aside for the fascist to come in and reverse it.

[–] LandedGentry 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

He can’t pass anything he isn’t a legislator and this can’t be executive ordered

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If only his party controlled both houses of congress during his first year.

[–] LandedGentry 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

You can’t pass that with a simple majority.

I agree they should not be able to trade stocks. I think the democrats are being rat bastards for participating in it too. But I also understand that Biden could not single handedly solve that nor was it remotely a high enough priority to burn political capital and fight his own party over it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

You can’t pass that with a simple majority.

And here is where I explain to the feigned learned helplessness wing of the party that Democrats, if they had wanted to, could have done away with the filibuster forever with the simple majority we gave them. This could have been passed with a simple majority. You're making excuses, and I'm not accepting them.

But I also understand that Biden could not single handedly solve that nor was it remotely a high enough priority to burn political capital and fight his own party over it.

Yeah. He can only singlehandedly sell weapons for genocide.

[–] LandedGentry 1 points 22 minutes ago* (last edited 18 minutes ago)

I’m not sure where you got the idea that 1) I didn’t think he was a major enabler of the horrific genocide of the Palestinian people or 2) that it is at all relevant. You’re just flinging shit at the wall and seeing what sticks now to paint me as some evil dem bootlicker because you’re behaving like a petulant child who doesn’t understand how government works. Fuck Biden and fuck Israel for the genocide they are committing. Happy? Is that the slam dunk you were hoping for?

He can’t remove the filibuster. He can’t force legislation on Congress. He can’t executive order that kind of rule for Congress. The democrats and republicans in Congress have to end this practice. This is basic civics. He can vocalize it all he wants but he can’t make them do anything.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 14 hours ago (6 children)

You just never looked into what they're really doing, and for some reason media isn't keen on reporting all the good proposals and legislations they were doing, I wonder why.
This administration was the best one in centuries, both in terms of legislation and in terms of administrative work. The only question they aren't good on is Palestine, and incidentally it's the only thing that media suddenly cares about, I wonder why(2).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago

This administration was the best one in centuries

Stop expecting progressives to buy this just because you love the slide to the right.

[–] LandedGentry 3 points 3 hours ago

I largely agree but let’s not forget Afghanistan. Trump contributed but the Biden admin was elected to be the adults in the room and they looked totally disorganized and incompetent during that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The only thing they didn't do good on was that one small genocide they enabled, hah oops lmao

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

It's such a good thing there is an alternative that really, really great at stopping genocides. We are so happy that now those evil genocidal maniacs will be out of the office and there will be no genocides forever. They will finally stop pressing that genocide button that they have, which controls genocides.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

Biden didn't need to sell weapons to Netanyahu. Your "magic button'" shit trivializes what you're glad Biden did to enable genocide for you.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

This reads as sarcasm. Except its not so much a button that stops genocides, its... a different mechanism

Edit: evidently this was not clear enough. The mechanism is not legal to mention.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Every genocide has to stop eventually. Otherwise it's not a very effective genocide...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

Intent is just as important as the result.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I am starting to believe that Americans trully believe there is a mechanism that starts and stops genocides and it's located within reach of the American president. This notion is so fucking wild it's impossible to believe y'all really totally thinking it, but it is jingoistic enough for me to start believing y'all are bathsit insane enough for it.

[–] LandedGentry 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

If the US stopped giving armaments and money to Israel once it became clear what they were doing and then followed up with actual punitive measures yes it would have stopped it. Israel is committing genocide with the approval of the US.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If every politician that supports genocide gets removed from office, the genocides stop. What a surprise.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Do you also believe they have egg prices dial? Oh, by the way, you got your wish, the current administration will be removed from the office, if a genocide will not stop in February, will you eat your words and admit that you were wrong or not?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

So, did you not read what I said? I said "all politicians that support genocides get removed, genocides stop"

If all politicians that support genocides get removed, and yet america is still somehow magically supporting genocide, yes, ill eat my words. Itd be real difficult to eat though, as that is fundamentally impossible.

Also comparing a genocide to egg prices is facetious and in bad faith. If you pull another strawman like that im going to assume you are a troll and stop engaging.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Considering they can subsidize anything they want, kind of, yes. Why can't we have a small temporary subsidy when the chickens get sick on a massive scale? Is that too logical?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Is this a new form of "their both the same?"

[–] LandedGentry 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

s such a good thing there is an alternative that really, really great at stopping genocides.

I read this as saying both sides (Republicans and Democrats) support genocide.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

I mean they do. Theyre different in a lot of ways, i wouldnt normally dare compare the two. But as evidenced by bidens administration and their ineptitude, they dont really care about genocides or the poor. Thats not to say theyre the same. One side doesnt care, the other is actively malicious.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 hours ago

Because the media is owned by Republicans

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The only question they aren’t good on is Palestine

Yes, other than that they were perfect. For example, they never would have continued Trumps racist border policy.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Believe it or not, for the amount of power they have, they are actually doing pretty good. We probably want them to ditch checks and balances and do good dictatorship for a moment to fix centuries of racist bullshit that permiated the US, but I am pretty sure it's not realistic. I wish it wasn't so, but the US is very, very racist country, and it reflects.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Believe it or not, for the amount of power they have, they are actually doing pretty good.

...at moving right.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Oh come on, don't give these sandbagging stooges more credit than they deserve. The only reason what you're saying doesn't sound quite as batshit insane as it should is that we haven't had a government that prioritizes the working class even close to as much as the rich since WWII. Biden isn't terrible compared to his peers but his peers have all been sucking the same corporate dick for so long that no one young enough to know what Lemmy is have ever experienced anything else. Calling that greatness is not being objective it's just a lack of imagination.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

It's always important to thinglk about things in context and perspective. When I say best administration, I don't compare it to the administrations of my hopes and dreams, that's not useful at all. I compare it to what was before and what's the possible alternatives.
Oligarchs want you to lose perspective, hope, and stop doing actionable things. They want you to believe that unless the administration is doing luxury gay space communism, they are as bad as anything else and shouldn't be supported. Don't fall for it.