2
(i made this on july 4th lel)
this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13505 readers
1224 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here
Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Libs do this kinda both-sides crap and people still somehow believe that queer people are safe and protected under liberalism. 😐
Libs get easily manipulated into believing things like pronouns shouldn't be visible for ???? reasons. Despite it being vastly nicer for anyone that isn't cis male. It's way nicer for women to actually have visibility compared to the "there are no women on the internet" mindset.
I wonder if, given how many liberals are TERFs, they don’t actually want to show pronouns visibly to push back on that “there are no women on the internet” mindset specifically because a trans woman’s “she/her” is the same as their “she/her”.
I feel like I've lost a sense when browsing other sites. it's valuable info on the perspective others are bringing to the table. I think it benefits the cis men also.
"WHY DO US MANLY MEN BE FORCED TO PUT OUT OUR PRONOUNS JUST BECAUSE OF AN EXTREME MINORITY WHO CAN'T EVEN TELL WHAT GENDER THEY ARE?! PEOPLE CAN JUST ASSUME WE GO AS HE/HIM! MOST PEOPLE ON THE INTERNET ARE MEN ANYWAY. 😤😤💪💪"
Yeah we got a nice opportunity to run those types off the site when the pronouns were made essentially mandatory