this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
140 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13535 readers
985 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So I think we already know the outlines of the typical criticisms of Breadtube, namely that it's vaguely-leftist content that focuses on cultural critique and gives a nod to socialist theory here and there but it doesn't actually achieve anything and it's just a media-consumption demographic with no moves towards anything that resembles on the ground organising and activism. (Obviously there are a few outliers but as a rule this generally holds true.)

I dipped out of Breadtube years ago for plenty of reasons but I just posted on Lemmygrad criticising the SPD Three Arrows movement which prompted me to have a look at the Breadtuber Three Arrows and they have done exactly the same thing that Contrapoints and a lot of other large figures in this genre have done:

They build up a healthy Patreon base and then their content drops off to like a couple of videos a year, if that, while continuing to draw off a personal salary which rivals that of a full-time worker.

In the past two years Three Arrows has produced 4 videos, amounting to less than 4.5 hours of runtime all up.

That's staggering for someone who is getting over 60k a year, at the most conservative estimate.

Likewise Contrapoints claimed to be getting 20k a month and she's putting out like 1-2 videos a year. And there's plenty of other examples of this too.

Imagine what could be done if people supported their local grassroots organisations instead of paying boatloads of cash for their twice-yearly YouTube treats smh.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not even remotely what I'm arguing.. I'm fine with their videos (aside from Contra as her videos are mostly just her shit takes) in the same way I'm fine with Dark Souls not having excerpts from Capital in the loading tips. I don't really see them as overproduced because they're edutainment about niche topics and I like listening to people do passionate infodumps. I am subscibed to enough interesting people that I do not need them to put out a video every week to not feel betrayed. I don't agree with the premise that the videos are bad, I think most are better (aside from Contra because I think her ideas are often bad).

My criticism is that all this nonsense about "lazy" artists is absolutely barking up the wrong tree when you cam simply go watch a different channel if you want theory so badly, and it results in this frankly petulant display of entitlement to whatever artist's entire creative output because they get money and say leftist shit sometimes, to the point where people here sound like conservatives complaining about striking writers.

It's such a myopic obsession with a handful of white people who got this label despite not partaking in the label's original purpose of producing specifically anarchist YouTube videos, everyone acts like "beaftube" as they knew it in 2018 is some huge fall from grace and just ignore literally everyone else that makes shit, or imposing some fucking brand on a human being so that if they ever make explicitly leftist content then they're obliged to make that the only art they ever put out - or even obliged to put out more art, period. There is just so much content of regular people figuring out video editors and putting out videos to explain perspectives that never get attention otherwise, "The Autistic Horror of Don't Hug Me I'm Scared" is something you can just go watch right now, but people would rather complain about some YouTubers because they aren't making slop fast enough.

Capitalism has us brainwormed so we expect human beings to act like brands and get upset when they go "off-brand". "Breadtube" became these few white people's brand, they said most of what they could usefully say, and now people sit here unironically claiming that the problem with Contra is that she should make more political videos. Like motherfuckers where do you think her shit takes come from? If she recognized what she had to say on politics had a limit, respected that limit, and then focused on other topics while bringing up capitalism bad once in a while, that would have been better. People do not have an infinite amount of shit to say on a topic - hbomb figured that out and makes videos dissecting random and examining them in autistic detail, and that's why I love hbomb videos. If he started to shit out every fucking half-baked idea in his head about politics, that he didn't spend a long time thinking about in excruciating detail, he'd probably be known for shit takes too.

If at any point you needed any of these people to teach you what a feminine penis was, it is OK to move on to someone else, they do not need to be relevant to you forever. It's OK to read the damn theory yourself, but I'm not moralizing reading your assigned book, it's fine to go on Youtube and.see what other people think while you eat dinner. But it just makes people look ridiculous to act this upset about philosophytube or whoever taking too long to make a video and talk as though the revolution ever has or ever will hinge on their content output (and their content output alone).