this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
71 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13535 readers
880 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In short: By the time a person is 18, they must effectively be able to communicate and understand conversationally in 2 languages and casually use them in daily life..., if not become completely fluent...

Other than that, any language goes (whether it is a locally-known one, or a popular one worldwide),

The only thing I hope to gain from this, is to rid the world of /Monolingual Betas/

Seriously though, has this been a policy before? Because I haven't heard of such one...

I think this can especially be used for citizenship...

Edit: I don't necessarily have any other presupposed requirements besides bilingualism, though we may have certain notions of such in this main goal

Edit II: In furthering this venture, I have realized that my liberalism may slightly poisoned my lens....

And for clarification...

Minimum dual language system:

Main national language + other language (likely another related language, but foreign ones are fine)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was even mandatory in my high school in Texas (Burgerland state where they’re building a wall).

That doesn’t mean you actually walk away remembering it, especially depending on the teacher and your ability to retain it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Rote memorization of phrases isn’t learning a language. It’s memorizing a dictionary. It’s the worst possible way to teach a language which is why everyone forgets everything within 3 years of graduation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Right, but not every school district in the US does it that way any more. I’m sure plenty do though.