this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
385 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2389 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Just fucking end marriage. It's fucking archaic. When two people become partners they enter a business partnership . That's it. It should be treated as such.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That feels sad lol. People like marriage because it feels good and it's romantic. It's not supposed to be a business partnership.

Lemmy man. We need more normies here.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Love and romance has little to do with the privileges granted by the state. Or do you think people should not be allowed to marry if they are not in love?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, that's fine too, but the vast majority of marriages now are based on love. Business arrangements are fine too, they just aren't what people usually get married for.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are other parts of the world besides the super wealthy West

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That argument could be turned around. There are other parts of the world other than the East. I get what you're saying though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

well then have a party, invite your friends and put on your pretty dress and say you're married now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Cool thanks! I loved wearing my wedding dress and saying my vows.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

A wedding and a relationship doesn't require endorsement by the government. Go have a ceremony, grow old together, but you don't need your local county clerk having a say in it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Had me in the first half

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

We should end the legal institution of marriage. It literally only provides two benefits: you can pool income for tax purposes, and you can share health insurance. Both of those items could easily be addressed without marriage, especially if we had universal healthcare or if you could add a partner to your health insurance like you can with car insurance.

Meanwhile, marriage in it's current form means that the state decides how much of your retirement savings you get to keep when your partner decides to leave you or you decide to leave your partner. It's the worst financial decision that it is possible to make to ever marry someone outside of your class because of that risk, and that risk sucks the joy and romance out of the whole thing.

If you want to have a fairy tale wedding or an important religious ceremony, go for it, but there is zero reason to get the government involved at all anymore.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

That's not true. There are plenty of other legal rights marriage conveys such as power of attorney and child custody.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You can also sponsor for immigration.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Imagine all of the right wingers who will take that talking point and run with it to justify banning gay marriage.

"Well, y'all don't even think marriage should be a fuckin' institution so why should you be allowed to do it? Hyuck hyuck hyuck"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I happen to agree, me and my wife lived together for years before getting paperwork done. Just finally had to do it, it is just too much work otherwise. From insurance, to property, to inheritance, to medical decisions. A justice of a peace simple thing.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

With divorce rates and the view on marriage not being great, we might finally go back to the “business partnership” it was before. Thank god.