this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
57 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13491 readers
941 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Shopping at Target "Do I want a Sodastream? ...Nah, I don't need one."

SWAT Team runs over "YOU WILL BUY THE SODASTREAM OR WE WILL SHOOT! PUT THE SODASTREAM IN YOUR CART AND KEEP YOUR HANDS WHERE WE CAN SEE THEM!"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

yeah, this is mostly right. however there have been cases where these laws were applied to an individual who was supposed to, say, receive reimbursement or speaking fees from a public university. And under the legal argument most of these laws are based on/making, they assert that the boycott itself is not speech (though speech advocating for a boycott is), and therefore not constitutionally protected, so future iterations of these laws could conceivably make it illegal to boycott israel as an individual.

also iirc some cases have happened where state employees were required to sign a loyalty pledge, but maybe they were technically contractors