this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
137 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13501 readers
904 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"I need my chicken to come in drumstick form or I can't eat it" fuck you either own the murder or change your diet coward

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I think maybe you're reading into my words a bit more deeply than I thought anybody would (though I am a vegan and you're right, I do like the idea of setting a high skill floor on eating meat because I am a vegan).

My argument is merely that it's okay to govern some treats differently than others because there are fundamentally distinct classes of treats and that therefore, proposing that people have to do the killing and/or butchering of an animal in order to acquire it is not analogous to requiring that people mine raw materials, process them into everything needed to produce semiconductors, and then build there own electronics "from scratch".

Which isn't really a Vegan argument,

Totally agree, but it would cut demand for industrial meat production so massively I have trouble rejecting the idea on these grounds alone

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

proposing that people have to do the killing and/or butchering of an animal in order to acquire it is not analogous to requiring that people mine raw materials, process them into everything needed to produce semiconductors, and then build there own electronics "from scratch".

No they're not perfectly analogous. But why "propose" anything? If you're Vegan why not just say "people shouldn't eat meat, carnists can get fucked"? Proposing a change in the rules of how meat should be eaten is just a reformist half measure. And the truth is you're not going to get anywhere without revolutionary activity. If you really had the power to enforce the rule that people can only eat meat if they butcher it themselves, then that would be reflective of a society in which a revolution has already happened. But we don't live in that kind of society. Nobody is going to pass that law because we live in a society run by carnists and capitalists. If you truly lived in a society where you could force the rules to be that, then you might as well just make eating meat entirely illegal at that point.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

For sure, and "people shouldn't eat meat, carnists can get fucked" has been said elsewhere

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

right, and "people can still eat meat as long as they kill it themselves" is a step backwards from that, as far as proposals go.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Agreed. It's also better than what we have now.