this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
401 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19148 readers
2766 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Abcnews.go.com

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Bracing for the "I'm all for their right to protest as long as they don't disrupt anything" idiots..

[–] xerazal 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If it doesn't disrupt anything, can it even really be considered a protest?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Nope, it can't. Good luck explaining that to the "I get that climate but inconveniencing commuters illegal" contingent, though..

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If it doesn’t disrupt anything, can it even really be considered a protest?

Yes, it can. The goal of non-disruptive peaceful protests is sometimes just to stand up and make it clear that a significant number of people hold this view.

Sometimes the intended audience is the protesters' own society, but in other cases it is intended as a show of solidarity to let oppressed people know they are not forgotten.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People are tired of wasting their time for no attention. If your cause needs attention, you don't politely stand on the sidewalk.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If you want to protest disruptively that's fine. I'm not advocating for one style over another, I'm just pointing out that both are valid forms of protest.

load more comments (3 replies)