Guy Debord, born on 28 December in 1931, was a Marxist philosopher and filmmaker who co-founded the Situationist International and authored "The Society of the Spectacle" (1967).
Guy Debord began his career as a writer after dropping out of the University of Paris, where he was studying law. Debord joined the Letterist International, a group of avant-garde French artists and intellectuals, when he was 18.
Debord was first to propose the concept of the "Spectacle", referring to the role of media, culture and advertising in post-World War II consumerist society, and the way it is able to commercially co-opt and repackage counter-cultural ideas and movements.
On the nature of media and the new-found emphasis on appearance, Debord stated "Just as early industrial capitalism moved the focus of existence from being to having, post-industrial culture has moved that focus from having to appearing."
The concept of "Spectacle" became central to the ideas of the Situationist International, which Debord co-founded in 1957. Ideas from the Situationists proved influential on protesters during the May 68 uprising in France, where quotes and slogans from Situationist work would appear on graffiti and posters.
Debord himself would disband the Situationist International in 1972, following internal tensions amongst its members, and would focus on creating experimental film and tabletop war games, publishing "A Game of War" in 1987.
Suffering from depression and alcoholism in his later years, Debord committed suicide at his home in 1994.
"The more powerful the class, the more it claims not to exist."
- Guy Debord
Situationist International
The Situationist International (SI) was an international organization of social revolutionaries made up of avant-garde artists, intellectuals, and political theorists. It was prominent in Europe from its formation in 1957 to its dissolution in 1972. The intellectual foundations of the Situationist International were derived primarily from libertarian Marxism and the avant-garde art movements of the early 20th century, particularly Dada and Surrealism. Overall, situationist theory represented an attempt to synthesize this diverse field of theoretical disciplines into a modern and comprehensive critique of mid-20th century advanced capitalism.
Essential to situationist theory was the concept of the spectacle, a unified critique of advanced capitalism of which a primary concern was the progressively increasing tendency towards the expression and mediation of social relations through objects. The situationists believed that the shift from individual expression through directly lived experiences, or the first-hand fulfillment of authentic desires, to individual expression by proxy through the exchange or consumption of commodities, or passive second-hand alienation, inflicted significant and far-reaching damage to the quality of human life for both individuals and society. Another important concept of situationist theory was the primary means of counteracting the spectacle; the construction of situations, moments of life deliberately constructed for the purpose of reawakening and pursuing authentic desires, experiencing the feeling of life and adventure, and the liberation of everyday life.
The situationists recognized that capitalism had changed since Karl Marx's formative writings, but maintained that his analysis of the capitalist mode of production remained fundamentally correct; they rearticulated and expanded upon several classical Marxist concepts, such as his theory of alienation. In their expanded interpretation of Marxist theory, the situationists asserted that the misery of social alienation and commodity fetishism were no longer limited to the fundamental components of capitalist society, but had now in advanced capitalism spread themselves to every aspect of life and culture.
When the Situationist International was first formed, it had a predominantly artistic focus; emphasis was placed on concepts like unitary urbanism and psychogeography. Gradually, however, that focus shifted more towards revolutionary and political theory. The Situationist International reached the apex of its creative output and influence in 1967 and 1968, with the former marking the publication of the two most significant texts of the situationist movement, The Society of the Spectacle by Guy Debord and The Revolution of Everyday Life by Raoul Vaneigem. The expressed writing and political theory of the two aforementioned texts, along with other situationist publications, proved greatly influential in shaping the ideas behind the May 1968 insurrections in France; quotes, phrases, and slogans from situationist texts and publications were ubiquitous on posters and graffiti throughout France during the uprisings.
-
Guy Debord: The Life, Death, and Afterlife of a Brilliant Crank :debord-tired:
-
Enragés and Situationists in the Occupations Movement :france-cool:
Megathreads and spaces to hang out:
- ❤️ Come listen to music and Watch movies with your fellow Hexbears nerd, in Cy.tube
- 💖 Come talk in the New Weekly Queer thread
- 💛 Read and talk about a current topics in the News Megathread
- ⭐️ September Movie Nominations ⭐️
reminders:
- 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
- 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
- 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
- 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
- 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog
Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):
Aid:
Theory:
Starting to realize that I have trouble initiating affectionate/intimate contact. I don't know what it is. Maybe having lived through a pandemic kind of fucked with my mind. But I never really was the type to hug people a lot in the first place. A friend/crush of mine has been hugging me more lately and it's not like it turn them away, but everytime I get the urge to initiate a hug I freeze and end up not doing anything. I feel kind of shitty for it
It's a consent thing rather than an initiating thing, but I ask people "Would you like a hug/could I have a hug?" a lot now.
Yeah, that might be part of it since it's something that's in the back of my mind.
I have had very good results with asking folks.
If they know you well they probably get it?
Probably. I still feel kinda bad though.
Very relatable and difficult to solve. All I can say is keep trying. I know it’s hard and it will probably take more than a 100 tries before you get it. But some time you will get lucky and you will be able to push through. I say this from experience. Progress is super super slow, but it’s still there.
Also obviously take other peoples advice about asking consent and thinking about if you really want it or if you think it’s expected of you.
Certainly not speaking for you, but I behave similarly in that context, and after some discovery on this site and elsewhere, I’ve determined I’m very likely on the spectrum. I think that probably has to do with it. There’s so much dissonance though because anything other than what I usually do makes me extremely uncomfortable even though I know it’s probably good for me in the long run :/
Though my uncomfortableness is probably cloaked in not knowing whether it is something that I “should” do.
I guess that is the autistic way for saying the world isn’t designed for people with different brains and it fucks me up. People here have offered me some pretty solid advice though, so there are definitely people who can empathize
OR you could be completely allistic and just not a touchy feely person and that’s completely valid too
Speak to the friend/crush about this. Explaining this issue to them is emotional intimacy that is way more serious than any physical intimacy. Covid did put bubbles around everyone. Hesitating breaking someones bubble is more than understandable. If they are initiating hugs they like you and they want you to like them. They might be unsure that you like them because of your psychological hangups. Having an open invitation to burst their bubble for hugs may be what you need to help stop the freeze.