this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
785 points (95.1% liked)

politics

18863 readers
4079 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has endorsed President Joe Biden’s reelection campaign, a sign of the president’s strength in uniting his party to have the backing of one of its most liberal members

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (9 children)

What exactly has Biden done wrong? He may not be as crazy left wing as you'd prefer, but really I don't see why so many on the left are saying he's so bad

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Although I think Biden has overall done a good job I am disappointed that they're running someone who is 80 years old. I would also like to see a general shift to the left, but at the same time I realize that the increased political division in the US makes this unlikely in the near term.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Giving up the incumbent advantage at a time like this is short sighted at best, and destructive and dangerous at worst.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

People always have some reason ready to roll out when telling you to settle for some shitty candidate you don't really like. I'm done with it. I compromised on Joe Biden to save America from Trump. I compromised in every election for my entire adult life. Now I'm voting for people I actually like. If the US is collectively dumb enough to go back to the GOP then we deserve the consequences of that choice.

You can call that selfish if you want but I've been waiting 35 years for the compromise candidate to be the one from my camp and there's always a bunch of armchair poly-sci experts coming out of the woodwork to explain why that would be irresponsible in the current political climate. Well too bad, I'm not voting for the geriatric anymore.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Must be nice to be a wealthy, single, white man who knows he won't suffer under a Trump admin.

Fuck the rest of the country, right? And our overseas allies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Like I said, if America is collectively dumb enough to vote Republicans into power after everything that's happened then another 4 years of a boring Democrat isn't going to fix that problem. If we're headed for some sort of collapse I'd rather deal with that now rather than later. Call that what you like but it's not my way of doing things that got us in this mess in the first place so you'll have to forgive me if I don't put much stock in your "keep doing the same things and hope something magically changes" approach.

I personally believe someone in the Bernie Sanders mold has a better chance of pulling in moderate voters than a Joe Biden does.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I really don't understand this attitude after how far the entire country backslide under Trump after 2016.

Like, I get it, I felt the same way in 2016 and pissed away my vote, but you've got to realize how counter productive this is after how much more fucked everything got in four years right? Assuming you aren't leaving the country, you do have to live with the consequences of another Trump presidency and further erosion of your rights.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the pointless reply. Next time just downvote and spare people from having to read "I disagree with you" but in dumber form.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

He ran on getting kids out of cages and there is still a giant open-air prison for refugees on the border. He busted the railroad union. Those are two pretty big issues for the left. He's further right than Obama, and probably futher right than Nixon, if you compare their platforms. Fighting fascism by moving further right is a really bad way to fight fascism.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This comment will stay in the negatives, but anyone who is looking at this objectively knows you're correct. They just don't like it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It's getting downvoted for the "crazy left wing" part, not the "what has Biden done wrong" part.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because he's ancient. He's a half century older than the majority of the voting population.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why is this a bad thing, specifically? Like, articulate reasons that this is bad.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because he isn't the one that's going to have to living in and running the world in another 20 years or fewer.

Because there are plenty of other choices that better represent the current and future population.

Because he was alive during a time that is so drastically different than the current world.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't want a representative of the population. I want someone competent who can accomplish policy objectives I share.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a very individualist way to look at a national decision.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't understand what you mean. The rest of the population can make the same choice in the same contest

That's what voting is.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right. And when the rest of everyone votes with the same exact mentality, what's the result?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

I'd assume we get competent leadership and avoid populism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

To say the quiet part out loud, he simply isn't charismatic enough to hold the President position. Common people don't feel their future to be secure under his leadership. Look at GOP's candidates meanwhile (DeSantis, Ramaswamy, Trump) - they are all populist if not anything else.

And like it or not, this perception matters. I can guarantee he'll recieve less votes this time (compared to last year, he can still marginally win simply because of how unpopular the Right has become).

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Populists should be fought because populism is a cancer. Biden is exceptionally charismatic, in my view. Significantly more so than most Presidential candidates not named Obama or Clinton.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Populism alone isn't bad. Sometimes, it's the only way to get a perspective or idea out there, and make it not seem like a taboo anymore. And some ideas out there are worth supporting.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Biden is exceptionally charismatic, in my view

I'm sorry, but that's a delusional take. A fricking potato has more charisma than Biden.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Biden has been great. The most transformative policies in 80 years. Great for the world.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

dafuq are you on about? Do we already have political shill bots on here?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)