this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
798 points (95.9% liked)

politics

19148 readers
1897 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ted Cruz has been slammed for joking that Texans should “join me in Cancun” as the state braces for a deep freeze.

“Texans, with the freeze coming, wrap your pipes, cover your plants, stay off icy roads & keep your family safe. And, if it gets too damn cold, join me in Cancun!” he wrote on X.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 59 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I refuse to give any clicks to any headlines that use the word slammed or any derivative or synonym thereof

[–] [email protected] 30 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Unless it's a wrestling news website

[–] MrBusiness 10 points 10 months ago

Or if it's followed by welcoming you to the jam

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

Or an article about doors.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Maybe wrestling news sites should steal political news sites headlines.

"Wrestler A CRITICISED for using unsportsmanlike move on Wrestler B"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

Never click anything from The Independent. They're clickbait shit.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You don't like your headlines reading like a bop-it toy?

BOP TED CRUZ!

SLAM TED CRUZ!

SH**T TED CRUZ! (in the face)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

SHART TED CRUZ!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Have you personally slammed someone?

Have you met anyone who has?

What did it look like?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

That's between me and my only fans.

I have actually met a couple pro wrestlers

Pretty fricken gnarly dude

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It happened once in nineteen ninety eight.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I think I remember that. Wasn't there a table involved?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

It was definitely an event for all Mankind.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

They're mistaken. It was actually a Space Jam, and it was '96.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

You know what "slammed" metaphorically means, here.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

But it carries no weight when everyone's "slamming" everything in every headline. Maybe be less clickbait and more informative.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

I look forward to the day someone uses this headline and I open the article to see somebody actually get chokeslammed

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

That's a fair take. I don't really agree, as to me, it is just a popular idiom meaning that people reacted negatively to something and either criticized it or mocked it harshly - I don't think it has to carry a lot of weight - but I do think it's perfectly valid that you think it does. That's not, however, what I get from the comment I was responding to, at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Greg Gianfirte has. Can we use that in headlines when we talk about him? It's accurate in that case.