politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
It is very telling when the laws are used to dissuade and punish the illegal immigrants for working instead of the companies and corporations for hiring them. If you make illegal labor unprofitable then you will largely get rid of it.
Of course it's also very telling when people choose to use an incorrect term like illegal immigrant. Because of how often it is parroted and forced down our throat that we treat such an absurd statement as normal. (Not an attack on you. Just a comment on how natural it is even for myself to say that term without thinking) People aren't illegal. They may have crossed the border illegally. They're still immigrants whether they cross-legally or not. Calling them illegal immigrants and treating them as illegal allows us to dehumanize them easier. And enables the people abusing them to abuse them more.
They should be afforded the same basic guarantee and protections as anyone else. The same labor rights and expectations. Not forced to hide in the shadows. The people abusing them would change their tune suddenly if it cost the same to hire an immigrant as it did a citizen. And if we treated them with some basic respect and decency. We would not have to try to track them down all the time. Many of them would actively register and try to stay on good terms with the government. Making it easier for us to actually go after the few that are here for nefarious purposes.
When I say illegal immigrants I'm talking about the way they entered the country. Illegal is an adverb in this situation because it describes the way they immigrated.
In the future I'll try to use "illegally immigrating persons" so as to make this absurdly clear.
I know that. I said as much. My point was, regardless of how they got here (legally/illegally) they're just immigrants.
Crossing the border illegally isn't much different or more serious than jaywalking. Legally speaking. We don't categorize or call out people as jaywalking Americans. So why do we feel this burning need to categorize immigrants in that way? Because it benefits a particular group with far-reaching resources and power.
By feeling compelled to refer to them in some way as being illegal. We short-circuit a lot of other logical process when it comes to topics surrounding these immigrants. Is it our broken immigration system that is a problem? No it's illegal immigrants. Is it greedy conniving underhanded employers that hire illegal immigrants that are the problem? No we just stopped with them being illegal immigrants and therefore they are the problem.
I think you and I would both agree however that it is our immigration system. That is a problem. That it is the people taking advantage of them and employing them, that are the problem. But we are not helping them or ourselves by using the terms and language chosen by the abusers.
TLDR.
They're just immigrants. And nearly every last one of them would happily be documented and have legal status if our immigration system wasn't problematic and broken. Referring to them as illegal takes the onus off the system and places it where it doesn't belong. Does that make sense?