this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
325 points (87.0% liked)

World News

38914 readers
2220 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I don’t blame them. Ukraine needs to take the war to Russia to win.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 67 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

What warnings? Last I heard the very deliberate language was that the US "Did not encourage" strikes inside Russian territory. Has that language escalated?

Can't read the article due to the torrent of pop ups unfortunately because I'm very interested to know the basis of the headline.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The article is paywalled anyway.

The basis for the title is that Ukraine is still hitting targets in Russia. Honestly, I don't believe the US was serious about their comments opposing those strikes. US oil companies will just make more profits after all.

I believe the argument was that it would raise global oil prices but that wouldn't make sense unless Russia is doing a better job of bypassing sanctions than we know about. There have been rumblings of Russia using intermediate countries to move oil and other resources, so there is that.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

And note the source. It’s basically an industry rag.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

If anything, it's an obligatory, "no... please... don't..." to maintain plausible deniability.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It just seems super vague to me. It says that they are ignoring the advice to call off the strikes, but there's nothing in there from an official or anything about what exactly they are being advised. Maybe I'm splitting hairs here, but it doesn't seem definitive at all as to what's being communicated.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

It is vague and it needs to be because at best this is second hand account of what it was said.