642
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The late-night talkshow host John Oliver has offered to pay Clarence Thomas $1m annually – as well as give him a $2m tour bus – if the Republican judge resigns from the US supreme court.

Oliver made the proposal on Sunday’s episode of his HBO show Last Week Tonight, saying the supreme court justice had 30 days to accept or it would expire.

The British-born, progressive comedian’s offer came after a steady drumbeat of media investigations in the previous several months established that Thomas failed to disclose that political benefactors bought him lavish vacation travel and real estate for his mother. Thomas also failed to disclose – as required – that he allowed school fees for a family member to be paid off and had been provided a loan to buy a luxury motor coach, all after openly complaining about the need to raise supreme court justices’ salaries.

As a result, Thomas’s impartiality came into question after he sided with the contentious ruling that eliminated the federal abortion rights once provided by the Roe v Wade case.

He also recently listened to arguments over whether Donald Trump can be removed from states’ ballots in the presidential election after the former president’s supporters – whom he told to “fight like hell” – staged the January 6 attack at the US Capitol in Washington DC. Thomas resisted pressure to recuse himself from matters pertaining to the Capitol attack, even though his wife, Ginni Thomas, is a conservative political activist who has endorsed false claims from Trump and his supporters that the 2020 election he lost to Joe Biden was stolen from him – which in turn fueled January 6.

Oliver alluded to all of those circumstances as he extended his lucrative offer to Thomas, saying: “Lot on your plate right now, from stripping away women’s rights to hearing January 6 cases … and you deserve a break, you know, away from the meanness of Washington. So you can be surrounded by the regular folks whose lives you made demonstrably worse for decades.”

The host suggested that Thomas could upgrade his “favorite mode of travel” by signing a contract requiring him to step down from the supreme court in exchange for $1m annually from Oliver along with the tour bus, which is outfitted with a king-sized bed, a fireplace and four televisions.

Oliver joked that Thomas possibly feared that making such a trade might attract negative judgment from one of his top benefactors: the Republican mega-donor Harlan Crow, who was reported to have maintained a private collection of Nazi memorabilia that included a pair of paintings by Adolf Hitler.

But Oliver said: “That’s the beauty of friendship, Clarence. If they’re real friends, they’ll love you no matter what your job is. So I guess this might be the perfect way to find out who your real friends actually are.

“So that’s the offer – $1m a year, Clarence. And a brand new condo on wheels. And all you have to do … is sign the contract and get the fuck off the supreme court,” Oliver remarked. “The clock starts now – 30 days, Clarence. Let’s do this!”

The yearly salary for supreme court justices – whose appointments are for life – is $298,500.

Neither Thomas nor the supreme court immediately commented publicly on Oliver’s offer. Oliver acknowledged he could end up going on “standup tours … for years” to be able to afford paying Thomas’s retirement if the justice accepts the proposal.

The arch-conservative is the longest-serving member of a supreme court dominated 6-3 by rightwingers. Thomas has been there since his 1991 confirmation, which was marked by testimony from Anita Hill, who accused him of sexual harassment while he supervised her in two separate jobs, at the US Department of Education and at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 153 points 4 months ago

God, imagine making almost 300k a year and complaining thst it's not enough. All the while actively making millions of people's lives demonstrably worse, at that

[-] [email protected] 55 points 4 months ago

I don’t know, I can see the value in paying them more, give the gravity of what they deal with….

Otherwise they might be open to bribery 😝

[-] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago

Or we could legislate checks and balances, so that we can hold powerful people accountable for corruption.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

As we have recently discovered with Donald Trump, the checks and balances are only as good as the people willing to enforce them.

A government is made of regular people, though notably ungoverned

[-] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

and who exactly would pass legislation holding themselves to account for crimes they have definitely committed?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Congress could pass the legislation, but they're just as corrupt

[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Like they say about religions: If higher wages is the only thing that keeps you from being bribed, you aren't a good judge to begin with.

There should be one of IRS's ninja vampire breathing in their back at all times.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

IDK, I can see the value in seizing the means of production and creating a anarcho-syndicalist commune, in which the economic system based on the exchange of commodities, such as money or goods, is abolished in favor of a fair and universal welfare through equal division of labor and thus the resulting production.

So TLDR: You want to pay the judges even more, creating an even greater divide between the judges and the people which lives their rulings affect, I want torches, pitchforks and guillotines.

By now I realize that I will never be able to travel to the US anyway, so I might as well just go all in...

Arise ye workers from your slumbers
Arise ye prisoners of want
For reason in revolt now thunders
And at last ends the age of cant.
Away with all your superstitions
Servile masses arise, arise
We’ll change henceforth the old tradition
And spurn the dust to win the prize.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

He also receives gifts worth literally millions of dollars per year. We're talking super yacht cruises, travelling via private jets, drinking $1000 bottles of wine. And he claims all those gifts don't affect his impartiality in any way, even when he's ruling over cases that directly affect his billionaire "friends".

[-] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

Unfortunately pennies for any comparable positions in the private sector. These people could be owners/partners at law firms easily exceeding half a million plus a year.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago

It's almost as if money shouldn't be the only motivating factor to accepting this kind of position...

[-] [email protected] 65 points 4 months ago

He won't take it. Taking the offer would basically confirm everything bad that's been said about him. It would also be admitting publicly that he will do literally anything for the right bribe. Thomas only likes to admit that behind closes doors.

[-] [email protected] 64 points 4 months ago

True, we all know he won't take it, especially considering that his benefactors would gladly match it for him to stay in his seat.

But it was a solid end to an episode outlining how scummy he is with his bribes. The episode wouldn't get as much traction as it would be seen as barely more than another call-out.

And in the one-in-a-milliom chance that he accepts, we still win.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago

I completely agree! It was a great "fuck you" to Clarence Thomas to really round out the episode lol

[-] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

I hope the ~~RV~~ motorcoach was just a leased demo

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago

Yes but the effect of taking the deal is that it won't matter for him anymore, because he will have retired and can hide away like the traitor he is.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago

Oliver makes the point that Thomas really does agree with the views of his billionaire owners, since he held those views even before he became a supreme court justice.

So he'll stay with the job where he can accept bribes while harming society as much as possible, rather than get paid and not get to do that.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

I still don't think his ego will allow him to admit that John Oliver is right about him though.

[-] [email protected] 63 points 4 months ago

Why would he take a cut in pay?

[-] [email protected] 38 points 4 months ago

Well with all the bribes Thomas is probably on the take for, yeah, it would be.

If Thomas were only getting the legit government salary, Oliver's offer would be over three times as much per year. Not to mention he gets that... sweet RV cringes /s

[-] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago

It's not an RV, it's a motor home!!!

[-] [email protected] 28 points 4 months ago
[-] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago
[-] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Thomas has me feeling MoCo FOMO

[-] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

If it were produced by Ford you would have:

FoMoCo MoCo FOMO

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 58 points 4 months ago

It feels really good having Jon Stewart and John Oliver to look forward to every week.

Just looked and seems like Mehdi Hasan found a new home at The Guardian.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago

How did someone like Clarence come to be? Was he bullied or something, or just a massive self serving ghoul from birth?

[-] [email protected] 26 points 4 months ago

Behind the Bastards has some episodes on him. It's been a while so I don't fully recall, but my memory of it was that he was always kinda gross and misogynist, and he was also self serving in hus choices. Those choices didn't always make him the right wing shitbag that he is now, since he originally was part of the Black Panthers.

After some time working for black Civil rights, he saw more money on the republican side and also saw hypocrisy on the democratic side. He said something to the effect of 'They're all racists, but at least Republicans are racist to your face/honest about it'(hey that sounds familiar...)

Again I remember money being a big part of it, so I've chalked him up to just being a selfish asshole who fought for causes once that would help himself and that made him look like he was on the right side of history once.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

He didn't really ever work for civil rights, he's been the token "good one" on the court his entire tenure.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I was talking about his earlier days before being in the court, where he was inspired by Malcom X and the Black Panthers, though he seemed more interested in the hard militarized image of them:

inspired by the Black Panthers.”

“He dressed like them. He talked like them. He had a beret. He had Army fatigues and he had the Army boots,” Gordon Davis, a former classmate, recalls in the above clip.

Thomas had a poster of Malcolm X in his dorm room. He reportedly boasted that he had read all of the activist’s speeches and, at one time, could have quoted some of them by heart. Thomas was not alone in his frustration with racial injustice at the time.

“I had evolved from being hopeful to being pissed off. A lot of young people in America was pissed off,” Orion Douglass, another of Thomas’ former classmates, says in the clip. “And they weren’t seeking a reconciliation, okay? They were seeking a coup, to change the whole thing.”

Edit but you're probably right that he never worked toward it. I kinda recall him being a lawyer for a while and thought he may have back then, but I could be remembering wrong.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

He's obsessed with the image of authority and power, the black Panthers just happened to be humbling the state of California and the federal government generally. Ie. Hes am art collector that cares about the price not the content.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago
[-] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Take the deal man!

If only. =(

[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago

Good, now let's watch this supposedly corrupt bribe taking devoid of integrity man turn down a million dollars a year for every reason in the book other than his legacy and integrity which he does not have or so I've heard.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I think that's the whole point. He knows Thomas won't take the money. It's not about the money.

Oliver is just using the money as bait, so when Thomas says "I'm not taking the money because my job is about being just and whatever.", he can fire back by pointing out everything that was discussed in the video.

Best case scenario, Thomas takes the money and retires, then Biden appoints a Democratic-leaning judge to fill the spot and bring more balance to the Supreme Court.

Worse (and most probable) case, Thomas ignores the offer for as long as possible. Pretends like it never happened. Then when someone eventually asks about it, he can play dumb or list whatever bullshit high-horse reasoning he wants, which Oliver can then point out the obvious hypocrisy and that's that.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

I think you mean John Oliver.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Thanks, edited. My mind was in two places when i wrote my comment.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

He wouldn't do it because he wants to stay in power to harm liberals

[-] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Too close to the election. Republicans will just block a Biden nomination until after the election, in the hopes of another Trump nominee.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
642 points (96.0% liked)

politics

18138 readers
4119 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS